Hi
I had another look to this attempt to properly support alloc fancy
pointers.
I consider all your remarks appart from the big one below about all
this being a waste of time :-)
I do not see why we should use the alloc fancy pointer type in our
_Hashtable implementation detail
On 1/11/21 3:02 AM, Andreas Krebbel via Gcc-patches wrote:
> The vec-abi-varargs-1.c testcase on IBM Z currently fails.
>
> While adding an SI mode vector to a DI mode vector the first is unpacked
> using:
>
> _28 = BIT_INSERT_EXPR <{ 0, 0, 0, 0 }, _2, 0>;
> _34 = [vec_unpack_lo_expr] _28;
On 1/10/21 7:45 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>>> gcc/testsuite/
>>> * gcc.target/vax/cmpelim-eq-notsi.c: Use subtraction from a
>>> constant then rather than addition.
>>> * gcc.target/vax/cmpelim-le-notsi.c: Likewise.
>>> * gcc.target
On 1/9/21 5:43 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
This patch adds the ~(X - Y) -> ~X + Y simplification requested
in the PR (plus also ~(X + C) -> ~X + (-C) for constants C that can
be safely negated.
>>> This regresses VAX code produced by
Check if AR is usable for LTO build with --enable-pgo-build=lto:
checking for -plugin option... ar: no operation specified
Failed: ar --plugin
/usr/gcc-11.0.0-x32/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.0.0/liblto_plugin.so rc
no
configure: error: AR with --plugin and rc is required for LTO build
ins
On 1/8/21 7:38 PM, Anthony Sharp wrote:
Hi Jason,
Thank you!
To start with, do you have a copyright assignment on file or in the
works already?
Good point. I incorrectly assumed it would only be a minor
contribution copyright-wise. > Mr Edelsohn gave me a template which I've
now filled out a
On 1/9/21 5:23 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch teaches find_template_parameters to visit the template
represented by a CTAD placeholder, which is normally not visited by
for_each_template_parm. This template may be a template template
parameter (as in the first testcase), or it may implicitl
On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 16:31 -0800, Carl Love wrote:
> Will:
>
> I have addressed you comments with regards to the Change Log entries.
>
> The extra define vec_div was removed.
>
> Added the missing entries for DIVU_V2DI DIVS_V2DI in rs6000-call.c.
>
> The extra MULLD_V2DI case statement entr
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:53:15AM -0800, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> Check if AR is usable for LTO build with --enable-pgo-build=lto:
>
> checking for -plugin option... ar: no operation specified
> Failed: ar --plugin
> /usr/gcc-11.0.0-x32/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/11.0.0/liblto_plugin.s
On 1/7/21 4:06 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
This is essentially a followup to r11-3714 -- we ICEing from another
"unguarded" call to build_concept_check, this time in do_auto_deduction,
due to the presence of templated trees when !processing_template_decl.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-lin
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 07:42:07PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> Hi Segher,
> I've been holding off pinging these knowing you had a lot of other
> review work, but maybe that's settling down now? You already OK'd
> 1/8, 2/8 and 6/8.
Ping.
> [PATCH 3/8] [RS6000] rs6000_rtx_costs tidy AND
> https://g
If fancy_abort is called before the diagnostic subsystem is initialized,
internal_error will crash internally in a way that prevents a useful
message reaching the user.
This can happen with libgccjit in the case of gcc_assert failures
that occur outside of the libgccjit mutex that guards the rest
On 1/11/21 4:40 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/7/21 4:06 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
This is essentially a followup to r11-3714 -- we ICEing from another
"unguarded" call to build_concept_check, this time in do_auto_deduction,
due to the presence of templated trees when !processing_template_decl.
B
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:56 AM CHIGOT, CLEMENT
wrote:
>
> >> Hi David, Clement,
> >>
> >>> The patch is local to libstdc++ AIX support, so I believe that I can
> >>> approve it.
> >>
> >>have you considered merging the dragonfly and aix trees? I'm asking
> >>because it seems prudent to try and
I pushed this patch to update the DR table with a few new DRs. Also update
some of the older ones to reflect that they're included in C++20.
Marek
commit 6be6626d59e1c492d5e05606e5a6902feb9e5bac
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Mon Jan 11 17:18:45 2021 -0500
C++ DRs: Add new DRs, update older
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 1:20 PM Alan Modra wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:53:15AM -0800, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> > Check if AR is usable for LTO build with --enable-pgo-build=lto:
> >
> > checking for -plugin option... ar: no operation specified
> > Failed: ar --plugin
> > /usr/gcc-1
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 08:57:04AM -0800, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> Check if AR works with --plugin and rc before passing --plugin to AR and
> RANLIB.
Thanks for looking at this, but next time please assign the bug to
yourself. I fixed the bug too this morning, before seeing your
email.
--
On 11/01/2021 15:58, Daniel Engel wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021, at 7:39 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 11/01/2021 15:26, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>> On 11/01/2021 11:10, g...@danielengel.com wrote:
From: Daniel Engel
gcc/libgcc/ChangeLog:
2021-01-07 Daniel Engel
>>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 3:05 PM Alan Modra wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 08:57:04AM -0800, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> > Check if AR works with --plugin and rc before passing --plugin to AR and
> > RANLIB.
>
> Thanks for looking at this, but next time please assign the bug to
> yourself. I
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021, at 7:21 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> Some initial comments.
>
> On 11/01/2021 11:10, g...@danielengel.com wrote:
> > From: Daniel Engel
> >
> > These definitions facilitate subsequent patches in this series.
> >
> > gcc/libgcc/ChangeLog:
> > 2021-01-07 Daniel Engel
> >
This PR wants us not to warn about missing field initializers when
the code in question takes places in decltype and similar. Fixed
thus.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/98620
* typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_record): Do
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 08:57:05AM -0800, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> diff --git a/config/gcc-plugin.m4 b/config/gcc-plugin.m4
> index c5b72e9a13d..798a2054edd 100644
> --- a/config/gcc-plugin.m4
> +++ b/config/gcc-plugin.m4
> @@ -145,6 +145,18 @@ for plugin in $plugin_names; do
> break
>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 3:27 PM Alan Modra wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 08:57:05AM -0800, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> > diff --git a/config/gcc-plugin.m4 b/config/gcc-plugin.m4
> > index c5b72e9a13d..798a2054edd 100644
> > --- a/config/gcc-plugin.m4
> > +++ b/config/gcc-plugin.m4
> > @@ -1
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 04:07:22PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> These are not fatal errors. Here is the updated patch to use
> AC_MSG_WARN instead. OK for master?
OK by me. Please squash the two patches.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:22 PM Alan Modra wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 04:07:22PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > These are not fatal errors. Here is the updated patch to use
> > AC_MSG_WARN instead. OK for master?
>
> OK by me. Please squash the two patches.
>
I will keep 2 separate since I
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 02:52:43PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 1:20 PM Alan Modra wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 11:53:15AM -0800, H.J. Lu via Binutils wrote:
> > > Check if AR is usable for LTO build with --enable-pgo-build=lto:
> > >
> > > checking for -plugin option.
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 1/9/21 5:23 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > This patch teaches find_template_parameters to visit the template
> > represented by a CTAD placeholder, which is normally not visited by
> > for_each_template_parm. This template may be a template template
>
Successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Pushed to master as r11-6603-gab88f3607233376c3145c320e92e71943a495bb5
gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog:
PR analyzer/98628
* store.cc (binding_cluster::make_unknown_relative_to): Don't mark
dereferenced unknown pointers a
On 1/11/21 8:08 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/9/21 5:23 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch teaches find_template_parameters to visit the template
represented by a CTAD placeholder, which is normally not visited by
for_each_template_parm. This templat
On 1/11/21 6:19 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This PR wants us not to warn about missing field initializers when
the code in question takes places in decltype and similar.
Hmm, the warning seems of questionable utility with templated code like
this, but I guess this is a reasonable middle ground.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021, at 8:32 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> A general comment before we start:
>
> CLZ was added to the Arm ISA in Armv5. So all subsequent Arm versions
> (and all versions implementing thumb2) will have this instruction. So
> the only cases where you'll need a fallback are armv6
ChangeLog:
2021-01-12 Qian Jianhua
* MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Add myself
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index c0aa23df57e..e88808f9fe2 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -451,6 +451,7 @@ Daniel Jacobo
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:57 PM David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> If fancy_abort is called before the diagnostic subsystem is initialized,
> internal_error will crash internally in a way that prevents a useful
> message reaching the user.
>
> This can happen with libgccjit in the case of g
101 - 133 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
