Successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Pushed to master as r11-6497-gac3966e315ada63eb379d560a012fa77c3909155.
gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog:
PR analyzer/97072
* region-model-reachability.cc (reachable_regions::init_cluster):
Convert symbolic region handlin
on 2021/1/6 上午2:19, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 1/4/21 7:36 PM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> on 2021/1/5 上午7:13, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/22/20 11:40 PM, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi Segher,
on 2020/12/22 下午9:55, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just a
> >>
> >> Note there's a data dependency between them. insn 7 feeds insn 9. When
> >> there's a data dependency, combiner patterns are usually the better
> >> choice than peepholes. I think you'd be looking to match something
> >> likethis (from the . combine dump):
> >>
Using combiner patterns
Hi:
ix86_expand_fp_vec_cmp/ix86_expand_int_vec_cmp are used by vec_cmpmn
for vector comparison to vector mask, but ix86_expand_sse_cmp(which is
called in upper 2 functions.) may return integer mask whenever integer
mask is available, so convert integer mask back to vector mask if
needed.
gcc/Cha
On Jan 5, 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> But isn't this a consumer issue then? If there is no line info for
> a PC range then gdb shouldn't display any.
No, there *is* line info there, carried over from an earlier .loc
directive, as there isn't anything like ".noloc" to output with a
function t
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 21:25, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> > On 1/5/21 10:54 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> >>
> >> I fear I'm a bit lost here myself. I do have a little experience
> >> running various builders:
> >>
> >> * I inherited a Golang one on Solaris/amd64 (based on their own builder
> >>
On 1/4/21 12:47 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 1/4/21 12:01 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
Anyway, I'm going to update server hook first and I'll create an issue for
GitPython.
So I was not correct about this. Also the server hooks uses now GitPython
to identify modified files.
I've just created an iss
On 1/6/21 8:01 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> But isn't this a consumer issue then? If there is no line info for
>> a PC range then gdb shouldn't display any.
>
> No, there *is* line info there, carried over from an earlier .loc
> directive, as there is
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 1/6/21 8:01 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> >> But isn't this a consumer issue then? If there is no line info for
> >> a PC range then gdb shouldn't display any.
> >
> > No, there *is* line info there, c
On 1/4/21 10:45 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 1/4/21 1:06 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> --- a/gcc/final.c
>> +++ b/gcc/final.c
>> @@ -1735,7 +1735,12 @@ final_start_function_1 (rtx_insn **firstp, FILE
>> *file, int *seen,
>> last_filename);
>>
>>if (!dwarf2_d
101 - 110 of 110 matches
Mail list logo