Hi,
this is verion of patch I comitted (so benchmark teters picks it through
weekend). Failure caused by array descriptors are loved.
There is still one pdt_14 failure for which I opened
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97652
It is a previously latent problem in fortran related to pdt.
Hi,
this patch moves clone_info to summary.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, comitted.
Honza
2020-10-31 Jan Hubicka
* Makefile.in: (OBJS): Add symtab-clones.o
(GTFILES): Add symtab-clones.h
* cgraph.c: Include symtab-clones.h.
(cgraph_edge::resolve_speculat
Hi Marek,
Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 02:46:36PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On 10/28/20 2:00 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 01:36:30PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/24/20 6:52 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Here, in r11-155, I
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 6:28 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 6:09 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 5:54 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > Since "MASKMOVQ mm1, mm2" is an SSE instruction which requires MMX and
> > > MMX/SSE ISAs are handled separately, make __builtin_ia3
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 5:41 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 6:00 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 6:57 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > This commit in GNU binutils 2.35:
> > >
> > > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=b7d072167715829eed0
Yeah, that's true. Ok, it's not applicable then. Thanks!
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 18:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 07:56, Krystian Kuźniarek via Libstdc++
> wrote:
> >
> > > So then you need to produce a changelog entry by hand.
> > I had this problem on some old Ubuntu 18.0
Recently merged by 86558afc09e65b172377d4e759b00094dd985e8a. Thanks!
On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 13:26, Krystian Kuźniarek <
krystian.kuznia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A description of the problem/bug and how your patch addresses it:
> I've got a small patch for -Wunused-variable in system headers
The transition algorithm for std::shuffle_order_engine uses long double
to ensure that the value (max() - min() + 1) can be accurately
represented, to avoid bias in the shuffling. However, when the base
engine's range is small enough we can avoid slower long double
arithmetic by using double. For e
Hi Mike,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 08:42:04PM -0400, Michael Meissner via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> PowerPC: PR libgcc/97543, fix 64-bit long double issues
>
> There are two issues in PR libgcc/97543 which shows up if you build a GCC
> compiler with long double defaulting to 64-bit instead of 128-bit wi
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 4:07 PM Carl Love wrote:
>
> GCC maintainers:
>
> The following patch adds new builtins for the vector integer multiply,
> divide and modulo operations. The builtins are:
> vec_mulh(), vec_div(), vec_dive(), vec_mod() for signed and unsigned
> integers and long long intege
Hi,
Attached is a fix for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57076
Currently, we cannot build GCC when the source directory contains a @ character
(which is a problem for Homebrew, where we typically build in directories such
as /tmp/gcc@10/src: https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/pull/90
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 1:17 AM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:11:26AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/asan/asan_test.C
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > // { dg-additional-options "-DASAN_AVOID_E
After completion of test in normal and versioned namespace mode I
committed the attached patch.
Note that there are still failures in versioned namespace mode do to
missing symbol exports for which I'll propose an other patch.
On 30/10/20 7:48 pm, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 30/10/20 18:51 +
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 7:13 PM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hongtao Liu via Gcc-patches writes:
> >> > Hi:
> >> > For inline asm, there could be an operand like (not (mem:)), it's
> On 10/29/20 1:40 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 05:00:40PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > That's ugly and will for sure defeat warning / access code
> > > > > when we access this as char[], no? I mean, we
15 matches
Mail list logo