On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 8:51 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 7/5/19 12:09 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jul 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> >> On July 3, 2019 4:53:30 PM GMT+02:00, "Martin Liška"
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 7/2/19 7:15 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2019, Martin Lišk
The attached patch changes the class-key of class definitions that
satisfy the requirements on a POD struct to 'struct', and that of
struct definitions that aren't POD to class, according to the GCC
coding convention. The patch is also prerequisite for GCC being
able to compile cleanly with -Wmis
On 7/8/19 5:10 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 at 19:57, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/4/19 9:27 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
Similar to what already exists for TI msp430 or in TI compilers for
arm, this patch adds support for the "noinit" attribute.
It is convenient for embedded
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:44:32PM +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 03/07/2019 18:58, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > OK, thanks.
>
> Committed.
This broke following testcase.
error_mark_node type isn't really incomplete, it is errorneous, doesn't have
TYPE_MAIN_DECL and we should have diagnosed it earl
Hi!
The 4 testcases below weren't vectorized, because while
tree-vect-data-refs.c now allows more forms of simd lane access,
scan_operand_equal_p didn't allow combining them together.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
committed to trunk.
2019-07-08 Jakub Jelin
Hopefully with the right patch this time (thanks Jon).
On 7/8/19 4:00 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The attached patch changes the class-key of class definitions that
satisfy the requirements on a POD struct to 'struct', and that of
struct definitions that aren't POD to class, according to the GCC
cod
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
The patch apparently has DECL_IS_OPERATOR_DELETE only on the
replaceable global deallocation functions, not all delete operators,
contrary to DECL_IS_OPERATOR_NEW, so the name is misleading. On the
other hand, those seem to be the ones for which the opti
Hi Segher,
on 2019/7/9 上午12:32, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Kewen,
>
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 04:07:00PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> gcc/ChangeLog
>
> (You have trailing spaces in the changelog, fwiw).
>
Thanks for catching!
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr88497-1
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-06/msg01506.html
Jeff (et al.), do you have any outstanding questions/concerns
about the patch?
Martin
On 6/27/19 4:30 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 6/27/19 12:40 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On June 27, 2019 7:04:32 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On
On 08.07.19 23:19, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 14.06.19 15:09, Gaius Mulley wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> here is version two of the patches which introduce Modula-2 into the
>> GCC trunk. The patches include:
>>
>> (*) a patch to allow all front ends to register a lang spec function.
>>(inc
Hi,
For following test-case:
typedef double v4df __attribute__ ((vector_size (32)));
void foo(v4df);
int
main ()
{
volatile v4df x1;
x1 = (v4df) { 10.0, 20.0, 30.0, 40.0 };
foo (x1);
return 0;
}
Compiling with -msve-vector-bits=256, the compiler goes into infinite
recursion and eventuall
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo