Hi Thomas,
I tried failing cases of that kind; or assignment to len/kind part refs and
returned correct errors. Must check where I was going wrong.
Paul from a chilly Garching-bei-Muenchen
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, 13:38 Thomas Koenig Hi Paul,
>
>
> >> inq would be easier to understand and unambigu
Running tests in C++98 mode show that I had forgotten a 'return *this;'
in _Bvector_impl_data::operator=.
So here is the patch again.
On 10/30/18 7:28 AM, François Dumont wrote:
Following Marc Glisse change to ignore _M_start offset I wanted to go
a little step further and just remove it in _G
On 30/10/18 07:28 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Following Marc Glisse change to ignore _M_start offset I wanted to go
a little step further and just remove it in _GLIBCXX_INLINE_VERSION
mode.
I also fix a regression we already fixed on mainstream std::vector
regarding noexcept qualification o
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, Martin Sebor wrote:
> So it seems that the attribute handler should be using this macro
> instead. I also took the liberty to add more detail to the error
Note that it should only be used for alignments relevant to the object
file - *not* for alignments of variables with au
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:49:53AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 09:49:18PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 05:54:47PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > Yes, like that. It also easily can handle the other combos (those with
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 03:57:03PM +, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/30/18 12:18 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
> > OK, I was just being lazy allowing the spill. Do you think the split/expand
> > would be an RTL using left shift / right shift? Can you think of something
> > more clever? Since "
Hi,
On 30/10/18 21:37, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/26/18 2:02 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 26/10/18 17:18, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 4:52 AM Paolo Carlini
wrote:
On 24/10/18 22:41, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 10/15/18 12:45 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
&& ((TREE_CODE (dec
On 10/29/18 9:37 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 3:14 AM Martin Liška wrote:
On 10/24/18 7:24 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 4:59 AM Martin Liška wrote:
However, I still see some minor ICEs, it's probably related to decay_conversion
in cp_fname_init:
1) .
Hello,
This is an update and a ping to my original patch message[1].
I've attached an updated set of patches:
1) gcc48-stage1-build-libstdc++.patch: Makefile.tpl patch portion
which allowed me to build GCC 4.8.3 using GCC 8.1
2) gcc82-stage1-build-libstdc++.patch: analogous patch for GCC 8.2
pot
This patch (diffs to generated files omitted below) updates GCC to use
autoconf 2.69 and automake 1.15.1. (That's not the latest automake
version, but it's the one used by binutils-gdb, with which consistency
is desirable, and in any case seems a useful incremental update that
should make a future
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 20:50, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >
> > On Okt 30 2018, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> >
> > > This turns off D front-end where there's been reported bootstrap
> > > problems that need further investigation. Also added a co
Hi Maintainers,
PFA, the patch that enables support for the next generation AMD Zen CPU via
-march=znver2.
As of now, znver2 is using the same costs and scheduler descriptions written
for znver1.
We will update scheduler descriptions and costing for znver2 later as we get
more information.
Hi,
This simple patch avoids infinite recursion when tracing inlined function decl
by using
pre-defined macro DECL_FROM_INLINE in tree.h.
Bootstrap and test on x86_64 in patch set. Is it OK?
Thanks,
bin
2018-10-31 Bin Cheng
* auto-profile.c (string_table::get_index_by_decl)
Hi,
In new profile probability/count infra, we have different precision quality
categories,
and probabilities/counts of different categories are not supposed to be
compared or
calculated. Though in general is an improvement, it introduces unexpected
behavior.
Specifically, class profile_probabl
Hi,
This is a simple patch setting profile_count with according precision category
in
AutoFDO, as well as setting profile_count for exit basic block.
Bootstrap and test on x86_64 in patch set. Is it OK?
Thanks,
bin
2018-10-31 Bin Cheng
* auto-profile.c (afdo_calculate_branch_prob):
Hi,
This patch fixes AutoFDO breakage on trunk. The main reason for breakage is
AutoFDO
relies on standalone edge count computing and propagating profile
count/probability info
on CFG, but in new infra, edge count is actually computed from probability,
which leads
to chicken-egg problem and cor
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo