On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Koval, Julia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch adds 2 tuning options to -march=skylake-avx512. Ok for trunk?
>
> gcc/
>PR target/84413
>* config/i386/x86-tune.def
> (X86_TUNE_SSE_UNALIGNED_LOAD_OPTIMAL,
>X86_TUNE_SSE_UNALI
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 04:33:40PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> > > Ah, but we emit the resolver only if we see a use of it. That sounds
> > > quite
> > > broken, resolver in each TU that uses it? Better to have one at each
> > > definition...
> > >
> > > Jakub
> > >
> >
> > So after quit
On 04/12/2018 03:46 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
2018-04-12 Martin Liska
PR ipa/85329
* multiple_target.c (create_dispatcher_calls): Set apostrophes
for target_clone error message.
(separate_attrs): Add new argument and check for an emptry
string.
(ex
On 04/12/2018 03:46 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
2018-04-12 Martin Liska
PR ipa/85329
* multiple_target.c (create_dispatcher_calls): Set apostrophes
for target_clone error message.
(separate_attrs): Add new argument and check for an emptry
string.
(ex
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 11:53:51AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> > > 2018-04-12 Martin Liska
> > >
> > > PR ipa/85329
> > > * g++.dg/ext/pr85329.C: New test.
> > > * gcc.target/i386/mvc12.c: New test.
> > > @@ -413,7 +426,11 @@ expand_target_clones (struct cgraph_node *node, bool
> > > de
Hi Andre,
This is OK for trunk.
Thanks for the patch
Paul
On 13 April 2018 at 08:34, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Ping
>
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 14:25:50 +0200
> Andre Vehreschild wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> attached patch fixes (to my knowledge) the two PRs 81773 and 83606 where the
>> result of a
Hello world,
the attached patch fixes the PR, an 8 regression caused by
trying to convert a nested implied DO loop to an array
for a case where this was not possible.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
Regards
Thomas
2018-04-14 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85387
* fronte
Hi Thomas,
this looks good. Ok for trunk. Thanks for the patch.
- Andre
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 13:35:37 +0200
Thomas König wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> the attached patch fixes the PR, an 8 regression caused by
> trying to convert a nested implied DO loop to an array
> for a case where this was not
Hi Andre,
this looks good. Ok for trunk. Thanks for the patch.
Committed as r259384. Thanks for the quick review!
Looking at the serious regressions from the gcc home page,
we are fast approaching the gcc 8 release. Serious regressions
are below 100, and there are currently only
So, if anybo
Hello world,
whenever I look at the list of serious bugs, I find myself chaning the
columns to add the priority field.
What do you think about adding the priority field when clicking on that
link? A patch is attached.
Regards
Thomas
Index: index.html
==
Hi Paul,
thank you for the review. Committed as r259385.
Regards,
Andre
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 11:53:44 +0100
Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> This is OK for trunk.
>
> Thanks for the patch
>
> Paul
>
>
> On 13 April 2018 at 08:34, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> > Ping
> >
> >
11 matches
Mail list logo
