Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/es.po
(This file, 'gcc-8.1-b20180128.es.po',
if you do go can you please get some chicken fillets for papa thanks
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file, 'gcc-8.1-b20180128.sv.po',
Martin Sebor writes:
> On 02/24/2018 02:32 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Martin Sebor writes:
>>> On 02/23/2018 01:13 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:57:14PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> + /* get_inner_reference is not expected to return null. */
> + gcc_asse
Some command-line options have been deprecated for a long time. This
patch adds a warning for them, so that we can remove them in GCC 9
without surprising any users.
Segher
2018-02-25 Segher Boessenkool
* config/rs6000/rs6000.opt (mvrsave=no, mvrsave=yes, isel=no,
isel=yes)
Tested partially on Linux-x64, will test with the full suite on Linux-PPC64.
Ok for trunk and the gcc-7 branch? This is theoretically a breaking change
for the branch, but the committee has decided that they don't want
the support for copyable-but-not-movable types.
2018-02-25 Ville Voutilainen
Hi all,
I have noticed a recent interest to fix problems with -fdefault-integer-8.
Please don’t forget to mark new PRs as blocking pr32770. I have also posted new
results for the test suite.
I think it is a good time to submit the updated attached patch fixing some
C/Fortran interoperability i
Hi Dominique,
OK for trunk? back port?
OK for trunk.
The tests were non-conforming before, so this is also a
step in making our testsuite better.
For gcc-7, I'm not sure I would bother, but OK if
you want to do it.
Regards
Thomas
Sorry for the dropping the ball on this and thank you Jakub for stepping in!
I've had a patch set sort-of rotting in my local repo, but I like yours
better. I think I had gotten hung up on trying to figure out how to
write a test for this, and like you I just tested mine manually in gdb.
I do ha
Following up on discussion in gcc@, how does this documentation patch look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-02/msg00139.html
-Sandra
2018-02-25 Sandra Loosemore
gcc/
* doc/configfiles.texi (Configuration Files): Move info about
conditionalizing $target-protos.h to...
* doc/sourcebuild.te
While rewriting the template parameters of a member template
constructor to generate the corresponding deduction guide, we tsubst
the parms twice. In this bug, on the first pass we ended up lowering
the level of the 'auto' TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM to 1, so the second pass
blows up. This is very similar
Applying this one line from Ville's patch for 80654 fixes the Chromium testcase.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to 7 branch.
commit 57b9683f0ce55a410c567fcb2dc365a2cc848d6a
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 26 06:09:07 2018 +
PR c++/81589 - error with is_trivially_constructible
On Saturday 24 February 2018 03:28 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> In my mind that would be a perfectly reasonable approach.
> A variation on it might be to leave a new warning disabled
> in the first release, then include it in -Wextra the next
> release, and finally put it in -Wall.
>
> Unfortunately,
Dears,
Kindly find the patch bundle for Microblaze '-mpic-data-text-relative'
feature at the following link:
https://github.com/andrewsadek/microblaze-pic-data-text-rel/tree/pic_data_text_rel/PATCH%20BUNDLE
Description of the feature:
https://github.com/andrewsadek/microblaze-pic-data-text-rel/
14 matches
Mail list logo
