Hello world,
this rather self-explanatory patch makes sure we don't get an error
using reallocation on assignment for inlining matmul when
we don't have reallocation on assignment.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
Regards
Thomas
2017-12-25 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/83540
Hi,
the openacc standard states: If the acc_on_device routine has
a compile-time constant argument, it evaluates at compile time to a
constant.
The purpose of this is to remove non-applicable device-specific code
during compilation. In the case of asm insns which are device-specific,
remova
On 25.12.2017 19:47, Alexander Monakov wrote:
Hello,
we need the following follow-up fix for priority comparison in
sel_rank_for_schedule as demonstrated by PR 83513. Checked on
x86_64 by running a bootstrap and also checking for no regressions in
make -k check-gcc
RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board
Hi All,
This is a complete rework of the patch and of the original mechanism
for adding caf token fields and finding them.
In this patch, the token fields are added to the derived types after
all the components have been resolved. This is done so that all the
tokens appear at the very end of the
OK - thanks for the patch.
Paul
On 26 December 2017 at 12:12, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> this rather self-explanatory patch makes sure we don't get an error
> using reallocation on assignment for inlining matmul when
> we don't have reallocation on assignment.
>
> Regression-tested
[ was: Re: [C/C++] Add support for #pragma GCC unroll v3 ]
On 11/25/2017 11:15 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Index: testsuite/c-c++-common/unroll-5.c
===
--- testsuite/c-c++-common/unroll-5.c (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/c-c++-common/unr
