On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch implements the new separate shrink-wrapping hooks for aarch64.
> In separate shrink wrapping (as I understand it) we consider each register
> save/restore as
> a 'component' that can be performed independently of the o
FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_result_16.f90 -g -flto (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_result_16.f90 -g -flto (test for excess errors)
The ICE is for both -m32 and -m64 (module_procedure_3_db_1.f90 is the test
posted in my last mail)
% gfc module_procedure_3_db_1.f90 -flto
module_p
Hi all,
I now committed this, with changelog
PR rtl-optimization/78232
* combine.c (try_combine): Add a big comment about why reusing i2dest
is undesirable.
(change_zero_ext): Do not call simplify_gen_binary, do the
simplifications manually.
and the patch
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:46:38PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Something like the attached patch? Robin and me have spent quite
some time to figure out the new pattern. Two questions:
1) In the ma
This patch to the Go frontend and libgo copies the signal code from
the Go 1.7 runtime.
This adds a little shell script to auto-generate runtime.sigtable from
the known signal names.
This forces the main package to always import the runtime package.
Otherwise some runtime package global variables
On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> This patch documents the newly added flag in gcc 7 for the upcoming
> Qualcomm Falkor processor core.
Looks good to me. Probably a good idea for one of the ARM maintainers
to sign off, too.
Gerald
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:53:07PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 03:46:38PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Dominik Vogt
> >>wrote:
> >>>Something like the attached patch? Robin and me have spen
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 02:42:24PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
> > I ran SPEC2006 on a Cortex-A72. Overall scores were neutral but there were
> > some interesting swings.
> > 458.sjeng +1.45%
> > 471.omnetpp +2.19%
> > 445.gobmk -2.01%
> >
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:40:44AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the stack layout problems on AIX and
> Power as described here:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359
>
> The patch has been bootstrapped on AIX (32 Bit) and bootstrappend
> and regression
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:47:02AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:40:44AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > The attached patch fixes the stack layout problems on AIX and
> > Power as described here:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359
> >
> > The pat
Aaron Sawdey has been running the GCC testsuite on the power9 simulator and he
noticed that:
gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68532.c
does not run, and opened bug 78243 for this failure.
Now, if you compile pr68532 with normal options (-O2/-O3 and -mcpu=power8 or
-mcpu=power9) it works because wi
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Pat Haugen wrote:
> The following fixes a problem introduced by my earlier loop unroller patch,
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01612.html. In instances where
> the niter expr is not reliable we need to still emit an initial peel copy of
> the loo
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 07:21:15PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> --- gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md (revision 242048)
> +++ gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md (revision 242049)
> @@ -2542,10 +2542,13 @@ (define_insn "vsx_extract__p9"
>"VECTOR_MEM_VSX_P (mode) && TARGET_VEXTRACTUB
> && TARGET_VSX_SMALL
As I mentioned in my other emails, parsing /proc/cpuinfo has one issue
is that the current parsing assumes many different things about the
format. So the best way to do this is to parse
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/regs/identification/midr_el1 files
instead. To get which cpu are present (though n
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 07.10.2016 23:08, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This patch adds ilp32 multi-arch support. This is needed to support
>> multi-arch on Debian like systems.
>>
>> OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
>>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:40:44AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>> The attached patch fixes the stack layout problems on AIX and
>> Power as described here:
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359
>>
>> The patch has been boot
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo