On 08/26/2016 05:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
--- snip ---
So, I've come up the following. We now need to debate whether
Dominiq's observations mean that C402 does not apply to named
constant.
See my comment in the PR. The standard gives the explicit way to accomplish what
the user wants to do
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 26/08/16 10:40, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> I suppose
>> you could get away with using sth entirely private to the backend,
>> like "sysv abi valist", also not ever user-creatable. Does this
>> side-step the FE issue?
>
>
> It does.
>
> Ad
The Sony site simply does not exist any more; the IBM site has a
note of "The Cell/B.E. resource center and the multicore acceleration
zone on developerWorks are no longer available" (which is actually
a nice service I have not seen before).
Committed.
Gerald
2016-08-27 Gerald Pfeifer
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Paul Richard Thomas
wrote:
> Although we have said that we would commit on Monday if no review is
> forthcoming, we would very much prefer that somebody takes a look. We
> understand perfectly that a 4052 line patch is rather daunting.
> However, even a cursory sca
