Bin Cheng writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71347.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71347.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..7e5ad49
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71347.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-
This fixes a bootstrap comparison failure on SPARC/Linux introduced by the
reload change made for PR target/60040, which added calls to finish_spills
without previously calling select_reload_regs. This left finish_spills work
on uninitialized data, hence the comparison failure.
The patch chang
Hi David, Segher, Aldy!
Davids new selftest code found something for the rs6000-ibm-aix4.3
target, maybe you're interested:
/home/jbglaw/src/toolchain/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/jbglaw/src/toolchain/build/./gcc/ -xc -S -c /dev/null -fself-test
: internal compiler error: in altivec_init_builtins, a
Added myself to MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval).
Regards
Senthil
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 237571)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2016-06-18 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
+
+ * MAINTAINERS
On Sat, 2016-06-18 at 15:06 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Hi David, Segher, Aldy!
>
> Davids new selftest code found something for the rs6000-ibm-aix4.3
> target, maybe you're interested:
>
> /home/jbglaw/src/toolchain/build/./gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/jbglaw/src/toolchain/build/./gcc/ -xc -S -c /d
OK.
Jason
This fixes oversight in previous change. TARGET_LONG_PIC_PCREL_CALL is no
longer used
and can be removed.
Dave
--
John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
2018-06-18 John David Anglin
* config/pa/pa.h (TARGET_LONG_PIC_PCREL_CALL): Remove.
Index: config/pa/pa.h
The attached change is preparation for a patch to optimize indirect calls. For
this, we need to a
valid function pointer for fixup in __canonicalize_funcptr_for_compare. The
least-significant two
bits of the pointer should have the value 2, not 3, when the pointer points to
a function descript
Greetings all,
This is a major rework of floating point write routines. Most of the existing
critical code is retained. Much of the code is reorganized.
The problem with complex is that it is writing two floats with formatting.
Previously write_block, which does the actual output, was buried at t
A branch with a name matching scan-assembler pattern triggers
inappropriate FAIL.
E.g. branch fixups-testsuite and
- gcc.target/i386/pr65871-?.c (scan-assembler-not "test")
- gcc.target/i386/pr41442.c (scan-assembler-times "test|cmp" 2)
etc.
This is a recurring problem as can be seen by some -fno
On December 3, 2015 10:46:09 AM GMT+01:00, Janne Blomqvist
wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
>> On 1 December 2015 at 15:52, Janne Blomqvist
> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>>> wrote:
These three function used a h
Ping.
On December 1, 2015 1:54:58 PM GMT+01:00, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
>A couple of places used gfc_add_component_ref(expr, "string") instead
>of
>the defines from gfortran.h
>
>Regstrapped without regressions, ok for trunk stage3 now / next stage1?
>
>gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
>
>2015-11-2
Hi,
Ok for trunk?
Changes for v4 -> v3:
- rebased
- Use 4 argument levenshtein_distance() to save multiple strlen(typo)
calls as suggested by dmalcolm
Changes for v2 -> v3:
- rebased
Changes for v1 -> v2:
- subroutines using interfaces
- keyword arguments (named parameters)
Rewrite C++ au
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:00:15AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 01:55:00PM +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> > Regstrapped without regressions, ok for trunk stage3 now / next stage1?
> >
> > gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
> >
> > 2015-11-29 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> >
>
The attached patch slightly changes the order in which initializers
are checked for type compatibility to issue the same error for static
initializers of incompatible types as for automatic objects, rather
than rejecting the former for their lack of constness first.
I originally closed the bug as
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> A branch with a name matching scan-assembler pattern triggers
> inappropriate FAIL.
>
> E.g. branch fixups-testsuite and
> - gcc.target/i386/pr65871-?.c (scan-assembler-not "test")
> - gcc.target/i386/pr41442.c (scan-assembler-times "test|cmp"
On 06/16/2016 02:32 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Hi folks!
I've been working on a plugin to warn on unbounded uses of alloca() to
help find questionable uses in glibc and other libraries. It occurred
to me that the broader community could benefit from it, as it has found
quite a few interesting ca
Georg-Johann Lay writes:
> Senthil Kumar Selvaraj schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch fixes PR 71151 by eliminating the
>> TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION hook and setting
>> JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION to 1.
>>
>> As described in the bugzilla entry, this hook assumed it will get
>> c
18 matches
Mail list logo