On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 11:28:51PM +0900, Oleg Endo wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 02:32 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > Here's my updated version of the FDPIC patch with all requested
> > changes made and Changelog added. I've included all the original
> > authors. This is my first time writing such
Here is my promised backport to the GCC 5 branch, for the patch below
that went into ToT last week. As with the previous patch, I've
verified that it fixes the problem, bootstraps and has no new
regression test failures. Is this ok to commit to the gcc-5-branch?
-- Caroline Tice
cmt...@google.co
Here is my promised backport to the GCC 4.9 branch, for the patch below
that went into ToT last week. As with the previous patch, I've
verified that it fixes the problem, bootstraps and has no new
regression test failures. Is this ok to commit to the gcc-4_9-branch?
-- Caroline Tice
cmt...@googl
This is a ping for the patch to fix 61441.
Regards,
Sujoy
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Sujoy Saraswati wrote:
> Hi,
> This is another modified version of the patch, incorporating the
> previous comments.
>
> Bootstrap and regression tests on x86_64-linux-gnu and
> aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Hi!
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 04:09:26 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> this patch adds matching of non-constant CONSTRUCTOR expressions into
> operand_equal_p. [...]
> --- testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/operand-equal-2.c (revision 0)
> +++ testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/operand-equal-2.c (revision 0)
>
Hi Steve,
When an specification statement in a BLOCK construct has a
PARAMETER attribute, gfortran currently discards the entity.
This patch marks PARAMETER entity if in a BLOCK. I'm not
complete convince that this is the right fix, but it does
allow the testcase to compile and run. Built and
201 - 206 of 206 matches
Mail list logo