On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal
wrote:
> I have made the following changes in the estimate_reg_pressure_cost function
> used
> by the loop invariant and IVOPTS.
>
> Earlier the estimate_reg_pressure cost uses the cost of n_new variables that
> are generated by the Loop Invar
Yet another left shift of a negative number. Fixed in the obvious way.
Tested by completing the cris-* builds in config-list.mk using a trunk
compiler.
Installed on the trunk.
Jeff
commit 6759b0576ae1f474749cc901e0e3d5679f546251
Author: law
Date: Sat Sep 26 07:33:05 2015 +
[PAT
Another instance of left shifting a negative value. Fixed in an obvious
way. Verified all the mips configurations in config-list.mk build now
using a trunk compiler.
Installed on the trunk,
Jeff
commit fff8087106b686a8c0ac6c7dab3dd7e12cd717ba
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sat Sep 26 03:24:00 201
And now the SH port in the obvious way. Verified by building all the sh
configurations in config-list.mk with a trunk compiler.
Installed on the trunk,
Jeff
commit ac55233b083fc30445141c530fcf472786f935e7
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sat Sep 26 03:24:07 2015 -0400
[PATCH] Fix undefined
And now the ARC port. Tested by building the arc configurations in
config-list.mk with a trunk compiler.
Installed on the trunk,
Jeff
commit ce021a249da7da00877d20a4b3dc79b47eec19c1
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sat Sep 26 03:22:53 2015 -0400
[PATCH] Fix undefined behaviour in arc port
Jeff Law writes:
> @@ -9320,7 +9320,9 @@ arc_legitimize_reload_address (rtx *p, machine_mode
> mode, int opnum,
>if ((scale-1) & offset)
> scale = 1;
>shift = scale >> 1;
> - offset_base = (offset + (256 << shift)) & (-512 << shift);
> + offset_base
> + = ((of
Jeff Law writes:
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@
>"@internal
> Unconditional two-address add / sub constant"
>(and (match_code "const_int")
> - (match_test "ival == -1 << 31
> + (match_test "ival == HOST_WIDE_INT (HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U << 31)
Syntax error?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab
On 09/25/2015 10:39 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
The patch makes the detection of scop parameters in parameter_index_in_region a
bit more conservative by discarding scalar variables defined in function of data
references defined in the scop.
2015-09-25 Aditya Kumar
Sebastian Pop
Hello,
I've just submitted this PR, and the patch as well, which passes the
testsuite.
The problem is a missing deep copy when the rhs is a (scalar) derived
type constructor (with allocatable components) and the lhs an array.
The patch removes the nonconstantness condition, so that the deep_c
Dear Mikael,
Apart from the regtesting, this patch is 'obvious'. This is good for
trunk and, I would suggest, after a decent interval 5 branch.
Thanks for the PR and the patch.
Paul
On 26 September 2015 at 15:10, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just submitted this PR, and the patch as we
Le 25/09/2015 23:41, Steve Kargl a écrit :
The attached patch has been built and regression
tested on x86_64-*-freebsd. No regression occurred.
The patch removes a conditional within an assert()
that triggers when a BLOCK construct is encountered.
What happens here, I think, is symtree is a ne
Jeff Law writes:
> Another instance of left shifting a negative value. Fixed in an obvious
> way. Verified all the mips configurations in config-list.mk build now
> using a trunk compiler.
>
> Installed on the trunk,
Thanks Jeff.
Matthew
Fixed as 'obvious' in revision: 228169.
Cheers
Paul
2013-09-26 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/67567
* resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): For module procedures, take
the parent module name and the submodule name from the name of
the namespace.
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 03:34:22PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Le 25/09/2015 23:41, Steve Kargl a ??crit :
> > The attached patch has been built and regression
> > tested on x86_64-*-freebsd. No regression occurred.
> >
> > The patch removes a conditional within an assert()
> > that triggers when
On 14/09/15 11:57 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/10/2015 06:57 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
There is quite a bit of documentation of _FORTIFY_SOURCE that explains
its effect on user code.
I think there are only random blog articles discussing aspects of it,
most of them slightly incorrect or o
On 09/26/2015 09:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Would changes like this be suitable for _FORTIFY_SOURCE?
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/mutex b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/mutex
> index 5e5ced1..074bf26 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/mutex
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/mutex
>
On September 25, 2015 7:59:07 PM GMT+02:00, Andi Kleen
wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:01:47AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 09/25/2015 10:58 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> >Woops, we crossed wires. I just committed this patch. Would you like
>> >me to revert it?
>> Leave it. If Andi can include
On September 25, 2015 6:52:37 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Law wrote:
>On 09/22/2015 03:26 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>> This patch is essentially identical to v1 here:
>>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg00729.html
>> The only change is in the ChangeLog, moving the libgo.exp
>> ChangeLog entr
> +@item partition-cold-min-freq
> +When using doing function partitioning and there is no profile information
> +consider edges below this frequency cold. Setting to zero disables
> +any function splitting without profile information.
>
> Trouble parsing "using doing", nice hack otherwise.
Th
On 25 September 2015 at 17:14, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> The caller of do_pragma(), which is destringize_and_run() then detects
> that pfile->directive_result.type is set, and then puts the tokens of
> the pragma back into the input stream again. So next time the FE
> requests more tokens, it's goi
[Note to libcpp, C, and Fortran maintainers: we still need your input :-)]
Hello,
David Malcolm writes:
[...]
> Here's the revised comment I put in the attached patch:
[...]
> + The class caches the lookup of the color codes for the above.
> +
> + The class also has responsibility for tr
Manuel López-Ibáñez writes:
> On 25 September 2015 at 17:14, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> The caller of do_pragma(), which is destringize_and_run() then detects
>> that pfile->directive_result.type is set, and then puts the tokens of
>> the pragma back into the input stream again. So next time the
22 matches
Mail list logo
