As discussed in PR64130, this patch improves the VRP value ranges for
unsigned division.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu and regression
tested on arm-none-linux-gnu with no new regression.
Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Kugan
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-06-20 Kugan Vivekanandara
On 16/06/2015 22:45, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 16/06/15 22:18 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
>> On 12/06/2015 01:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> This fixes two test failures when the default compiler mode is
>>> -std=gnu++14
>>>
>>> FAIL: 25_algorithms/headers/algorithm/synopsis.cc (test for excess
Hi
2 experimental tests are failing in debug mode because
__do_str_codecvt is sometimes taking address of string front() and
back() even if empty. It wasn't use so not a big issue but it still
seems better to avoid. I propose to rather use string begin() to get
buffer address. I kept operator&
JUMP_LABLE() must be defined after optimization completed. In this case,
it is doing optimization, and is almost finished, so it is no chances to
set JUMP_LABLE() next. The related issue is Bug 65803.
2015-06-20 Chen Gang
* config/bfin/bfin.c (hwloop_optimize): Set JUMP_LABEL() after
On 20/06/15 12:03 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
2 experimental tests are failing in debug mode because
__do_str_codecvt is sometimes taking address of string front() and
back() even if empty. It wasn't use so not a big issue but it still
seems better to avoid. I propose to rather use strin
On Jun 19, 2015, at 5:36 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Maybe you should ask Richi or Jakub about the testcase because you are
> placing it in a non-target-specific location. It should succeed on
> all targets, but it may expose latent bugs on other targets.
A latent bug is one that is broken, but
