Yesterday I did a mistake in a preparation of the patch for PR65710.
Here is the patch correcting the mistake.
The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64, ppc64, and aarch64.
Committed as rev. 221983.
I am committing the patch also to gcc-4.9-branch a bit later.
2015-04-10 Vladimir
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, EXT-Barrett, James wrote:
> The following links are broken at gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/4.9.2. The
> corresponding 4.9.2-related links at gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs are also broken:
> GCC 4.9.2 GNAT User's Guide (/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/gnat_ugn_unw/)
> also in PDF (/onlinedocs
This came up on IRC today. Editing testsuite_files isn't the only way
to run a subset of tests.
Committed to trunk.
commit 97f1afff492953efa83e07fdbf66af2b77a5ee89
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date: Fri Apr 10 20:58:54 2015 +0100
* doc/xml/manual/test.xml: Improve documentation on running a s
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Hale Wang wrote:
> According to the run-time ABI for ARM architecture, this function is allowed
> to corrupt only the integer core registers permitted to be corrupted by the
> [AAPCS] (r0-r3, ip, lr, and CPSR). So we can't just simply use the existing
> GNU conversion function
Thanks for doing this, Hans-Peter!
I committed a small follow-up on the editorial side, that removes
an empty paragraph, spells C and C++ in uppercase letters, and
simplifies a sentence.
Gerald
Index: simtest-howto.html
===
RCS file
I'm sure this still isn't complete, but at least it now contains
information for releases since 4.5, and documents any deprecations.
Committed to trunk.
commit ad10c021b751c515a2e20c74661594a5e99dcede
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date: Mon Jan 27 12:31:06 2014 +
* doc/xml/manual/evolution
On 10/04/15 22:08 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Tested on ia64-suse-linux, installed as obvious.
Thanks, for this and the m68k one.
...as I had discussed with Joe back in fall 2013. Ahem.
Committed.
Gerald
2015-04-10 Gerald Pfeifer
* doc/contrib.texi (Contributors): Update Joe Buck's entry.
Index: doc/contrib.texi
===
--- doc/contrib.texi(revis
On 04/03/2015 07:41 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 03/18/2015 11:51 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 03/17/2015 07:12 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Why are we outlining a DECL_EXTERNAL function?
SRA has no restrictions on whether a function is DECL_EXTERNAL.
Aha.
So it seems that DECL_EXTERNAL is the
Hi,
this patch adds the second testcase that was committed in 4.9 for
PR65647 on trunk.
Committed as rev 221981 and ChangeLog typos are fixed in 221982 and 221993 :/
2015-04-10 Yvan Roux
PR target/65647
* gcc.target/arm/pr65647-2.c: New.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/a
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/cpplib/fr.po
(This file, 'cpplib-5.1-b20150208.
cpplib-5.1-b20150208.fr.po.gz
Description: Binary data
The Translation Project robot, in the
name of your translation coordinator.
Hi Terry,
I went ahead and committed some small changes to the description of
-masm-syntax-unified. Let me know if you disagree or would like to
see further changes.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
>> htdocs/svn.html has four occurrences, and a few other pages also
>> have some. Though I don't think it's appropriate to adjust the
>> like of news.html, should I update svn.html?
> Sure, go ahead.
Done thusly.
Can you please look into mirrors.html wh
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/cpplib/fr.po
(This file, 'cpplib-5.1-b20150208.
cpplib-5.1-b20150208.fr.po.gz
Description: Binary data
The Translation Project robot, in the
name of your translation coordinator.
On Sun, 8 Sep 2013, Caroline Tice wrote:
> I believe I have addressed all the issues with the Vtable Verification
> feature. I have updated the announcement patch, and have attached the
> updated patch. Is this OK to commit?
Eeh, I just noticed nobody ever applied the patch below. :-(
Sorry abou
I would appreciate it if you would do it.
-- Caroline Tice
cmt...@google.com
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Sep 2013, Caroline Tice wrote:
>> I believe I have addressed all the issues with the Vtable Verification
>> feature. I have updated the announcement p
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html
>>
>> But there is a problem with the link to built-ins in onlinedocs.
>>
>> The HTML reads
>>
>> Support for AVR-specific > href="http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/AVR-Built_002d
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This test was failing at -O due to non-trivial conversion at assignment.
> The reason is that gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op created invalid GIMPLE,
> because fold_ctor_reference called via fold_const_aggregate_ref was
> discarding a cast, so
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:06 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> This test was failing at -O due to non-trivial conversion at assignment.
>> The reason is that gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op created invalid GIMPLE,
>> because fold_ctor_reference called via
...per a discussion we had last year when he stepped down.
Applied ("Committed revision 222000", a nice number ;-).
Gerald
2015-04-11 Gerald Pfeifer
* doc/contrib.texi (Contributors): Add Laurynas Biveinis.
Index: doc/contrib.texi
=
The Go spec says that carriage returns in raw string literals should
be discarded. The Go frontend was not doing that. This is
http://golang.org/issue/10407. This patch from Minux fixes it.
Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Committed to mainline.
Ian
diff -r 2f1e891
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 05:15:33PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:06 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >> This test was failing at -O due to non-trivial conversion at assignment.
> >> The reason is that gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op
On Apr 10, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> < KFAIL: gdb.cp/oranking.exp: p foo4(&a) (PRMS: gdb/12098)
> ---
> > KPASS: gdb.cp/oranking.exp: p foo4(&a) (PRMS gdb/12098)
> 20065c20065
> < KFAIL: gdb.cp/oranking.exp: p foo101("abc") (PRMS: gdb/12098)
> ---
> > KPASS: gdb.cp/oranking.exp: p
25 matches
Mail list logo