On 09/30/2014 06:48 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
The intrinsics still fail to support certain variadic cases, such as
template void bar() {
static_assert(__is_trivially_constructible(T, Args...), "");
}
Oops.
Jason
Am 05.09.2014 um 05:40 schrieb Jeff Law:
> On 09/04/14 21:16, Trevor Saunders wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Looks like the patch is to big to send uncompressed, so sorry if this
>> the second mail you get :)
>>
>> Given picochip has been obsolete for several years at this point, and
>> when I asked a while b
On 09/22/14 08:04, Teresa Johnson wrote:
The approach we now take for LIPO builds is to propagate the counts
LIPO?
for the profiled copy of the COMDAT to other modules. (Additionally
the indirect call profiling we perform in LIPO mode would point to a
module that we didn't have access to, w
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 09/22/14 08:04, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>
>
>> The approach we now take for LIPO builds is to propagate the counts
>
> LIPO?
>
See https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LightweightIpo It is a feature in google
GCC branches.
David
>> for the profiled
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 09/22/14 08:04, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>
>
>> The approach we now take for LIPO builds is to propagate the counts
>
>
> LIPO?
Sorry, Lightweight IPO (https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LightweightIpo),
implemented and used on google branches. We do
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> expand_vselect for some reason ignores the expander.
> Does it work with expanders?
> The comment talks about insn only:
> /* Construct (set target (vec_select op0 (parallel perm))) and
>return true if that's a valid instruction in t
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
