Re: [PATCH][PR debug/60655] Power/GCC: Reject cross-section symbol subtraction

On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 09:47:15AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > Alan, > > Any feedback? It is just papering over the real bug(s), of course, so I'd be inclined to say this doesn't belong on trunk. If you take a look at the assembly that is failing, you find gcc is trying to output a location e

Re: [RFC] Tweak gcc.c-torture/execute/pr39228.c

Hello! > It looks that alpha has the similar issue: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-08/msg02660.html > > alpha and sh redefine dg-options to "-mieee" in the test case > instead of the default dg-options "-w" and get the above warning. > The patch below tweaks the test to fix it. Per

Re: [RFC] Tweak gcc.c-torture/execute/pr39228.c

Uros Bizjak wrote: > -/* { dg-options "-mieee" { target sh*-*-* alpha*-*-* } } */ > +/* { dg-options "-w -mieee" { target sh*-*-* alpha*-*-* } } */ > /* { dg-skip-if "No Inf/NaN support" { spu-*-* } "*" "" } */ > > Please use /* { dg-add-options ieee } */ directive here. There is > another one p

Re: [Patch, Fortran] PRs 61881/61888 - Fix issues with SIZEOF, CLASS(*) and assumed-rank

Thomas Schwinge wrote: On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 01:47:02 +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: [...] 2014-07-26 Tobias Burnus * gfortran.dg/sizeof_4.f90: New. [...] I noticed that the sizeof_4.f90 test case has not been checked in, probably just forgot to svn add the file? I have now committed

<    1   2