David Malcolm writes:
> On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 15:08 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 08/06/14 11:19, David Malcolm wrote:
>> > gcc/
>> >* rtl.h (for_each_rtx_in_insn): New function.
>> >* rtlanal.c (for_each_rtx_in_insn): Likewise.
>> OK. Note that we're moving away from for_each_rtx... I h
On 08/13/2014 08:48 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Ok, modified patch attached. The changelog entry was attached to the previous
mail as an evil binary attachment (gmail...)
Ah, so it was.
here, for convenience:
Thanks; having it in the body of the mail is more convenient for me as
'git am'
Hi,
I get a segafult in decl_maybe_in_construction_p during function versioning.
We have following steps in clone creation (e.g. as in
create_version_clone_with_body):
1. Create function decl
2. Create clone of cgraph node
3. Copy function body
After the first step there is no body attached
Hi,
testcase in PR 62092 triggers assert I added to temporarily check that new
ipa-devirt code handles all cases as ipa-prop devirtualization. In this case
ipa-prop gives wrong answer because of bug I introduced into
walk_aliased_vdefs. The function_entry_reached is supposed to be cleared at
begg
On 08/14/2014 01:06 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Janis Johnson
> wrote:
>> The check for effective target arm_v8_neon_ok passes even if __ARM_ARCH
>> is not 8 or greater, but then some tests fail because intrinsic functions
>> used in the test have not been d
Minor tweak, committed.
* config/rl78/rl78-virt.md (movhi_virt): Allow const->far moves.
Index: config/rl78/rl78-virt.md
===
--- config/rl78/rl78-virt.md(revision 213994)
+++ config/rl78/rl78-virt.md(working copy)
@@
Ping?
Best regards,
Thomas
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme
> Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 1:57 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Fix confusion between target, hos
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 08/14/2014 04:31 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>
>> g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/fp16-mangle-1.C is failed because GCC now sets
>> DECL_COMDAT on template instantiations if flag_implicit_templates is in
>> effect. Then DECL_WEAK will be set accordingly.
The G10 family doesn't support this opcode. Committed.
* config/rl78/rl78-expand.md (umulqihi3): Disable for G10.
* config/rl78/rl78-virt.md (umulhi3_shift_virt): Likewise.
(umulqihi3_virt): Likewise.
* config/rl78/rl78-real.md (umulhi3_shift_real): Likewise.
Letting GCC think that any mem-mem alternative is OK leads to trouble
with far mem to far mem moves, so split out the moves we can make.
Committed.
* config/rl78/predicates.md (rl78_near_mem_operand): New.
* config/rl78/rl78-virt.md (movqi_virt_mm, movqi_virt)
(movhi_virt_
Minor optimization. Committed.
* config/rl78/rl78-real.md (addqi3_real): Allow adding global
variables to the accumulator.
Index: config/rl78/rl78-real.md
===
--- config/rl78/rl78-real.md(revision 213996)
+++ co
Andi Kleen writes:
Ping!
> From: Andi Kleen
>
> To use gcc-{ar,ranlib} for boot strap we need to add a -B option
> to the tool. Since ar has weird and unusual argument conventions
> implement the code by hand instead of using any libraries.
>
> v2: Fix typo
>
> gcc/:
>
> 2014-08-04 Andi Kleen
The attached patch enables the -pthread flag for cygwin targets. While
not strictly necessary for compiling or linking with pthread or _r
functions on Cygwin, accepting it allows for better compatibility with
other platforms.
--
Yaakov Selkowitz
Associate Software Engineer, ARM
Red Hat, Inc.
On 08/14/14 15:36, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Right. I think they're held up on patch 40 (ironically the one that
conflicts with yours).
I think we could declare side effects in notes as invalid and add some
ENABLE_CHECKING bits to enforce that. With those in place, my concerns
around #40 from
On 08/06/14 11:22, David Malcolm wrote:
/
* rtx-classes-status.txt: Update.
---
rtx-classes-status.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rtx-classes-status.txt b/rtx-classes-status.txt
index b22cb1e..90d6efd 100644
--- a/rtx-classes-status.txt
+++
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
As analyzed in PR62032, this patch fixes the latent lto bug b
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Bin.Cheng wrote:
>> >> The overflow check can be improved by using deeper inspection to prove the
>> >> equality. This patch deals with that by making below two improvements:
>> >> a) Handles constant cases.
>> >> b) Uses affine expansi
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Konstantin Serebryany
wrote:
> In order for your work to be generally useful, I'd ask several things:
> - Update
> https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/CompileTimeOptimizations
> with examples that will be handled
Done (to be honest I only plan to do
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo