On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:06:19PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as written in the PR, my patch seems wrong for platforms like
> powerpc that already had the __float128 typeinfo for long double
> with a different version. The following patch regtested fine on
> x86_64, and a hackish cross
On 04/22/2014 04:02 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Looks like a few uses of the old idiom:
BITS_PER_UNIT == 8 ? 3 : exact_log2 (BITS_PER_UNIT)
I do not think that these crept in as much as they were never squished out.
have crept in. This patch replaces them with LOG2_BITS_PER_UNIT.
Test
I made a stupid mistake when calculating the image index for corank > 1
arrays, which is fixed by the attached patch.
In addition, I help the middle end by telling it that caf_register
returns freshly allocated memory, which does not alias with other pointers.
Committed to the branch as Rev.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 04:26:23PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:06:19PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > as written in the PR, my patch seems wrong for platforms like
> > powerpc that already had the __float128 typeinfo for long double
> > with a differen
On 22-04-14 21:27, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Ping of this ( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00888.html )
patch.
Eric,
thanks for the review.
That patch isn't for GCC mainline though, but
I don't understand why you say that.
OK on principle if you test it
on mainline,
I have.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:29:55PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 04:26:23PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:06:19PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > as written in the PR, my patch seems wrong for platforms like
> > > powerpc t
On 04/22/2014 10:13 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 18:45 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
>>> --- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
>>> @@ -687,8 +687,9 @@ generate_loops_for_partition (struct loop *loop,
>>> partition_t partition,
>>>
> I don't understand why you say that.
Because it cannot be applied on GCC mainline.
--
Eric Botcazou
This patch from Chris Manghane changes the Go frontend to use the
backend interface for the initialization function. Bootstrapped and ran
Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline.
Ian
2014-04-22 Chris Manghane
* go-gcc.cc (Gcc_backend::temporary_variable): Pu
Altera requested us to extend the set of custom floating-point
instructions supported by the Nios II back end to include a round
instruction, with semantics matching the __builtin_lroundf function.
The basic machinery for this is already in place for the existing custom
instructions, so much of
2014-04-14 14:24 GMT+08:00 dw :
> Having resolved the objections, I'm posting the updated patch. I don't have
> permissions to commit this patch, but I do have a release on file with the
> FSF.
>
>
> Problem description:
> The existing documentation does an inadequate job of describing gcc's
> imp
2014-04-14 14:24 GMT+08:00 dw :
> Having resolved the objections, I'm posting the updated patch. I don't have
> permissions to commit this patch, but I do have a release on file with the
> FSF.
>
>
> Problem description:
> The existing documentation does an inadequate job of describing gcc's
> imp
Christian Bruel wrote:
> This patch allows constant propagation from HIQI modes, as illustrated
> by the attached testcase, by converting them into a new SImode pseudo.
> It also merge the HIQI mode patterns using general_movdst_operand for both.
>
> No regression on sh-none-elf. OK for trunk ?
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo