Re: [PATCH] Add --enable-host-shared configuration option

2013-10-11 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013, David Malcolm wrote: > Thanks. Presumably the initially posted configure/make patch still > needs review, right? Yes (by a build system maintainer, probably). -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

Re: Apply attribute returns_nonnull in libiberty

2013-10-11 Thread Marc Glisse
The gcc-specific part now. Bootstrap+testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu together with the libiberty patch (well, libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-4.c failed, but that randomly happens). 2013-10-12 Marc Glisse PR tree-optimization/58689 * system.h (concat, reconcat, choose_

Re: [PATCH] increase builtin_expert probability in loop exit test

2013-10-11 Thread Rong Xu
Attached is the patchset 2. It takes the max to two hitrates then does the incremental. On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Rong Xu wrote: > Hi, > > An earlier patch (r203167) changed the default probability for > builtin_expect to 90%. > It does not work properly for the following case: >while

Re: [PATCH][i386]Fix PR 57756

2013-10-11 Thread Sriraman Tallam
Ping. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: > I have updated the patch with one more test. > > Thanks > Sri > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Richard Biener >> wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Sriraman Tall

Re: [patch, Google, committed] update powerpc32 xfail file.

2013-10-11 Thread Brooks Moses
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Brooks Moses wrote: > I committed a patch to update the xfail file for our 32-bit Power > build configuration. As with the others, this ends up being a > significant reorganization, so the diff is less interesting than the > revised file. Thus, I've attached the

[PATCH] Introduce gcc::dump_manager class

2013-10-11 Thread David Malcolm
When repeatedly compiling within one process, the dumpfile numbering doesn't reset, leading to dumpfiles after the initial ones having unpredictable numbers like here (-fdump-tree-all at -O0): fake.c.000i.cgraph fake.c.004t.gimple fake.c.1477t.omplower fake.c.1478t.lowe

RE: [PATCH] Reassociate X == CST1 || X == CST2 if popcount (CST2 - CST1) == 1 into ((X - CST1) & ~(CST2 - CST1)) == 0

2013-10-11 Thread Zhenqiang Chen
> -Original Message- > From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 7:13 PM > To: Zhenqiang Chen > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reassociate X == CST1 || X == CST2 if popcount (CST2 - > CST1) == 1 into ((X - CST1) & ~(CST2 - CST1))

RE: [PATCH] Reassociate X == CST1 || X == CST2 if popcount (CST2 - CST1) == 1 into ((X - CST1) & ~(CST2 - CST1)) == 0

2013-10-11 Thread Zhenqiang Chen
> -Original Message- > From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 1:20 PM > To: Zhenqiang Chen > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reassociate X == CST1 || X == CST2 if popcount (CST2 - > CST1) == 1 into ((X - CST1) & ~(CST2 - CST1)) == 0 >

Re: Apply attribute returns_nonnull in libiberty

2013-10-11 Thread DJ Delorie
Alternatively, you could ask the other projects if they're ok with changing the xmalloc rule...

RE: [PATCH, libgcc] Disable JCR section when java is not enabled

2013-10-11 Thread Joey Ye
> -Original Message- > From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 16:48 > To: Joey Ye > Cc: p...@bothner.com; a...@redhat.com; Tom Tromey; H.J. Lu; gcc-patches; > 'Ian Lance Taylor' > Subject: Re: [PATCH, libgcc] Disable JCR section when java is not ena

<    1   2