Hello,
This is new patch version.
Comments from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer review applied.
Also, test case bitfildmrg2.c modified - it is now execute test.
Example:
Original code:
D.1351;
D.1350;
D.1349;
D.1349_2 = p1_1(D)->f1;
p2_3(D)->f1 = D.1349_2;
D.1350_4 = p1_1(D)->f2;
p2_3
Hello,
The attached patch fixes a few formatting nits in sh.md.
Committed as rev. 202876.
Cheers,
Oleg
gcc/ChangeLog:
config/sh/sh.md: Fix formatting.
Index: gcc/config/sh/sh.md
===
--- gcc/config/sh/sh.md (revision 202873)
Hello,
this was only minimally tested since trunk is broken at the moment. There
don't seem to be specific tests for the existing functors, so a couple
tests for the new specializations seem good enough.
2013-09-25 Marc Glisse
* include/bits/stl_function.h: Include for std::forwa
On 9/24/13 5:37 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this was only minimally tested since trunk is broken at the moment.
There don't seem to be specific tests for the existing functors, so a
couple tests for the new specializations seem good enough.
What about at least covering all of them? Just to m
2013-09-24 David Bartley
PR c++/58408
* gcc/cp/class.c: Don't require class to be constructed if it
has a trivial default constructor.
* gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/init-1.C: New testcase.
---
gcc/cp/class.c| 14 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++
>> It doesn't look right. IP relative address is only possible
>> with TARGET_64BIT and
>>
>> 1. base == pc. Or
>> 2. UUNSPEC_PCREL, UNSPEC_GOTPCREL, and
>> NSPEC_GOTNTPOFF.
>
> Target 64bit should be tested above. We however output RIP addresses
> also for basic symbol references. I.e. when ba
On 24 September 2013 23:37, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this was only minimally tested since trunk is broken at the moment. There
> don't seem to be specific tests for the existing functors, so a couple tests
> for the new specializations seem good enough.
>
I've had this sitting in my tree wa
Hi,
This patch is to address the problem described here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-09/msg00187.html
The patch changes ALLOCNO_MODE of a pseudo reg to be outermode if the
pseudo reg is used in a paradoxical subreg, so IRA will not mistakenly
assign an operand with a bigger mode to a smaller h
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> I've committed the patch below to google/integration (r202856) and
> gcc-4_8 (r202857) branches. Google ref: b/10872448.
I've committed r202880 to adjust line numbers for libstdc++ breakage
on google/gcc-4_8 branch.
Thanks,
2013-09-24
This patch from Chris Manghane corrects the Go frontend to not permit
assigning nil to the sink variable _. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite
on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline and 4.8 branch.
Ian
diff -r 869985e4ef63 go/parse.cc
--- a/go/parse.cc Thu Sep 19 10:30:42 2013 -0700
On Sep 23, 2013, Tom Tromey wrote:
> First, I believe I've addressed all of the comments in Paolo's review.
That's my feeling as well. Sorry that I didn't manage to go through
earlier versions of the patch before; I've just reviewed v4 plus the
discussions around v3.
Save for one detail, I'm e
Hello, Caroline,
On Sep 12, 2013, Caroline Tice wrote:
> 2013-09-12 Caroline Tice
> * Makefile.am: Re-instante ENABLE_VTABLE_VERIFY checks, to make
> sure testsuite is not run if libstdc++ and libgcc were not built
> with vtable verification.
> * Makefile.in: R
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I've had this sitting in my tree waiting to do something with,
I did ask last week if someone had done it already...
I'm about to go to sleep so didn't check if the test covers anything
yours doesn't.
In the test you have basic cover for all func
Il 25/09/2013 06:37, Alexandre Oliva ha scritto:
> On Sep 23, 2013, Tom Tromey wrote:
>
>> First, I believe I've addressed all of the comments in Paolo's review.
>
> That's my feeling as well. Sorry that I didn't manage to go through
> earlier versions of the patch before; I've just reviewed v4
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
