On 19 June 2013 20:56, François Dumont wrote:
> Still no chance to have a look ?
I'll try to finish reviewing it today, thanks for the reminder.
On 06/16/2013 01:08 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
This part of the patch series fixes problems with bad code being emitted
for unaligned bitfield accesses, as reported in PRs 48784, 56341, and
56997. A secondary goal of this patch was making the bitfield store and
extract code follow similar logic
Hi,
in this C++11 reject valid parsing issue, in a function-try-block we reject:
try
: f { func } { } (1)
and we normally accept the C++98:
try
: f ( func ) { } (2)
Considering cp_parser_save_member_function_body, I think that a neat
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 09:00:21PM -0700, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> --- common/config/i386/i386-common.c (revision 198950)
> +++ common/config/i386/i386-common.c (working copy)
> @@ -438,6 +440,18 @@ ix86_handle_option (struct gcc_options *opts,
> }
>return true;
>
> +case OPT_
Hello Richard,
> >> Does it still work with those changes, as below? If so, I'll check it in.
> >
> > I tested it. It is still working. So the patch is OK, please check it in.
>
> OK, I've applied this and the config.gcc patch.
Thanks.
In the native PS2SDK (i.e. no Linux) I detected that there
"Jürgen Urban" writes:
> Hello Richard,
>
>> >> Does it still work with those changes, as below? If so, I'll check it in.
>> >
>> > I tested it. It is still working. So the patch is OK, please check it in.
>>
>> OK, I've applied this and the config.gcc patch.
>
> Thanks.
>
> In the native PS2SDK
This patch packages the Steven G. Kargl's patch when MPFR 3.1.0 or newer
is available and fixes the original code for older versions using the
FX Coudert's machinery (see PR for details).
Tested on powerpc-apple-darwin9 and x86_64-apple-darwin10 without
regression.
OK for the trunk? If yes, co
Hi,
I added to mainline the testcase in Comment 16 of PR51213.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2013-06-23 Paolo Carlini
* g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae47.C: New.
Index: g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae47.C
===
--- g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae47.C
On Sun, 23 Jun 2013, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Gerald and Eric: Would the following work for you? (Sorry, no
> config.h.in/configure patch; I haven't build in maintainer's mode, yet.)
Yes, that looks like what I had in mind. Thanks, Tobias!
Gerald
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> This patch mentions support of Silvermont architecture in the
> gcc-4.9/changes.html page.
Looks good to me; just say "the new Intel...".
Thanks,
Gerald
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:12:17AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> > Bootstrapped and regression tested powerpc64-linux. OK to apply?
> >
> > * src/powerpc/linux64_closure.S (ffi_closure_LINUX64): Support
> > little-endian.
> >
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:12:17AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
>> > Bootstrapped and regression tested powerpc64-linux. OK to apply?
>> >
>> > * src/powerpc/linux64_closure.S (ffi_c
12 matches
Mail list logo
