On 12/12/12, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2012 Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > Convert tree-sra.c'candidates from htab_t to hash_table.
> >
> > Fold uid_decl_map_hash and uid_decl_map_eq into new struct
> > uid_decl_hasher. This change moves the definitions from tree-ssa.c
> > into tree-sra.c and
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 12/12/2012 19:11, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
>>
>> in RAW_CXX_TARGET_EXPORTS. There is no need to do anything.
>>> >
>>> > Nope, if you remove this you get the wrong definition of CC and CXX from
>>> > EXTRA_TARGET_FLAGS. Instead, you
On 11 December 2012 22:31, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> PR libstdc++/55631
> * include/ext/alloc_traits.h: Include missing header.
> * include/ext/pointer.h: Likewise.
> * include/ext/string_conversions.h: Require C++11.
> * libsupc++/initializer_list: Reindent.
I've updated libgo to the current master Go library sources. As usual
this e-mail only includes patches to files that are substantially
specific to gccgo. The bulk of the patch is available from the
repository or from the master Go repository. Bootstrapped and ran Go
testsuite on x86_64-unknown-
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 2012-12-12 Jakub Jelinek
>
> PR debug/55665
> * tree-inline.c (remap_decls): Change nonlocalized_list
> to pointer to pointer to vector from pointer to vector.
> (remap_block): Pass address of BLOCK_NONLOCA
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:01 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 12/12/2012 19:11, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
> >>
> >> in RAW_CXX_TARGET_EXPORTS. There is no need to do anything.
>
> Nope, if you remove this you get the wrong definition of
The Go spec was changed slightly: calling delete on a nil map is now a
no-op, rather than causing a runtime panic. This patch implements that
in gccgo. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline.
Ian
Index: libgo/runtime/go-map-delete.c
===
Fixup for a typo, on trunk and 4.7
-benjamin2012-12-12 Benjamin Kosnik
* doc/xml/manual/documentation_hacking.xml: Fix validation issue.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/documentation_hacking.xml b/libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/documentation_hacking.xml
index 91d16dd..05c05a6 100644
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 02:44:41PM -0800, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> +/* Hash a tree in a uid_decl_map. */
> +
> +inline hashval_t
> +uid_decl_hasher::hash (const value_type *item)
> +{
> + return item->decl_minimal.uid;
Ugh, why aren't you using DECL_UID here? The fact that DECL_UID is right
now
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Concerning 1push per cycle, I think it is same as K7 hardware did, so move
> prologue should be a win.
>> > Index: config/i386/i386.c
>> > ===
>> > --- config/i386/i386.c (revisi
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Concerning 1push per cycle, I think it is same as K7 hardware did, so move
>> prologue should be a win.
>>> > Index: config/i386/i386.c
>>> > ===
> > libcall is not faster up to 8KB to rep sequence that is better for
> > regalloc/code
> > cache than fully blowin function call.
>
> Be careful with this. My recollection is that REP sequence is good for
> any size -- for smaller size, the REP initial set up cost is too high
> (10s of cycles),
Hello Everyone,
This patch is for Cilk Plus branch affecting mainly the C compiler. It
checks to see if the gotos and increment expressions inside cilk_for are valid
and report errors otherwise.
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
Index: gcc/c-family/c-cilk.c
===
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > libcall is not faster up to 8KB to rep sequence that is better for
>> > regalloc/code
>> > cache than fully blowin function call.
>>
>> Be careful with this. My recollection is that REP sequence is good for
>> any size -- for smaller size,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:09:14PM -0800, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> > libcall is not faster up to 8KB to rep sequence that is better for
> >> > regalloc/code
> >> > cache than fully blowin function call.
> >>
> >> Be careful with this. My
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Various TM tests ICE when built with -fgnu-tm -fsanitizer=address.
> The problem is that asan.c pass adds calls to builtins that weren't there
> before and TM is upset about it. The __asan_report* are all like
> abort, in correctly
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 12/12/2012 11:50 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> 2012-12-12 Jakub Jelinek
>>
>> PR sanitizer/55508
>> * builtin-attrs.def (ATTR_TMPURE_NOTHROW_LEAF_LIST,
>> ATTR_TMPURE_NORETURN_NOTHROW_LEAF_LIST): New.
>> * asan
Try the following one. 1) -minline-all-stringops
-mstringop-strategy=rep_8byte -O2 vs 1) -mstringop_strategy=libcall
-O2.
David
#include
#include
#include
#ifndef LEN
#define LEN 16
#endif
void copy(char* s1, char* s2,int len) __attribute__((noinline));
void copy(char* s1, char* s2,int len)
Il 13/12/2012 00:23, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:01 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 12/12/2012 19:11, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
in RAW_CXX_TARGET_EXPORTS. There is no need to do anything.
>>
>> Nope, if yo
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:16:49PM +0100, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> Independently of this review, I think it's be interesting to hear
>> Kostya's voice on:
>>
>> Jakub Jelinek writes:
>>
>> > 2) In large-func-test-1.C, I had to stop matching
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
