On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 2012-12-07 09:12, Marc Glisse wrote:
but change ix86_expand_vector_set and others to generate vec_merge
and have only the vec_merge define_insn in sse.md? I guess it would
buy a large part of it. That's a p
The analysis of 55419 pointed out the conflict in a TARGET_EXPR having
both TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS and TREE_CONSTANT set. After reading that I
decided to stop setting TREE_CONSTANT on the TARGET_EXPR and do the
necessary work to adjust for that. And then was surprised to find that
no additional wo
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 13:37 -0600, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 2012-12-06 02:25, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
> > ! targetm.canonicalize_comparison ((int*)&compare_code, &op0, &op1, 1);
>
> The basic approach seems sound. But this cast is distinctly uncool.
>
> And why the unused return value?
101 - 103 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
