Instead of planning this change for the branch, would it be possible to
plan it for trunk directly, on top of the patches that I posted for
review there?
The patch could go in on top of the patches I posted.
Wei Mi writes:
> This is the part2.
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Wei Mi wrote:
Applied.
Gerald
Index: news.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/news.html,v
retrieving revision 1.133
diff -u -3 -p -r1.133 news.html
--- news.html 9 Apr 2012 14:02:08 - 1.133
+++ news.html 1 Nov 2012 21:49:03 -0
I think it is better to apply this patch to asan first to avoid extra
thread. You probably just need to retrieve your runtime part of the
trunk patch and resend it. Make sense?
thanks,
David
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Instead of planning this change for the branch
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, do...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: dnovillo
>
> Following a discussion we had on this list, this patch renames the
> file tree-asan.* into asan.*.
>
> * asan.c: Rename from tree-asan.c.
> Update all users.
> * asan.h: Rename from tree-asan.h
> Update all
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:52:52PM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> I think it is better to apply this patch to asan first to avoid extra
> thread. You probably just need to retrieve your runtime part of the
> trunk patch and resend it. Make sense?
Yeah, for trunk I believe it would be better t
Yes, there is no need to repeat the error made in asan branch in trunk.
David
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 02:52:52PM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> I think it is better to apply this patch to asan first to avoid extra
>> thread. You probab
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Wei Mi wrote:
>> Thanks for the suggestion!
>>
>> The planned svn commands will be:
>>
>> svn mv libasan libsanitizer
>> svn add libsanitizer/asan
>> svn add libsanitizer/tsan
>
> Probably keep the tsan cre
Ok, I will check in the patch.
Thanks,
Wei.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Wei Mi wrote:
>>> Thanks for the suggestion!
>>>
>>> The planned svn commands will be:
>>>
>>> svn
The regular comparison with Kaffe is gone after the restructuring/
move to github, and I could not find any replacement URL.
I applied this patch. If any of you has a new URL, we can resurrect.
Gerald
2012-11-01 Gerald Pfeifer
* status.html: Remove comparison with Kaffe.
Index: stat
Hi,
In r193053, input_location was mistakenly used. This patch changed to
use curr_insn_location instead. This looks like an obvious patch, can
I check it in to trunk?
Bootstrapped and passed gcc/gdb regression test.
Thanks,
Dehao
gcc/ChangeLog:
2012-11-01 Dehao Chen
* expr.c (expan
Like some other domains, redhat.com now defaults to http, so this
adjusts the link.
Gerald
2012-11-01 Gerald Pfeifer
* news.html: Use https for redhat.com.
Index: news.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/java/new
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
This patch converts tree-vpn to use wide-int. In doing so it gets rid of
all restrictions that this pass currently has on the target or source word
size.
The pass's reliance on a finite "infinite precision" representation has been
preserved. It fi
This patch refreshes wide-int.[ch]. Most of the changes are bug fixes
that were fixed for tree-vrp.c in patch 8.
There are two significant differences:
1) There are now constructors to override the precision and bitsize that
are normally taken from the type. These are used to perform the fi
either way, this needs to be investigated. it could just be my bad.
On 11/01/2012 06:28 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
This patch converts tree-vpn to use wide-int. In doing so it gets
rid of all restrictions that this pass currently has on the target or
so
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:41 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 04:13:20PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> Jack Howarth writes:
>>>
>>> >Currently the new testcase for gcc.target/i386/pr53249.c is failing
>>> > on darwin due to th
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:38:13PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr53249.c (revision 193061)
> >> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr53249.c (working copy)
> >> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> >> -/* { dg-do compile { target { ! { ia32 } } } } */
> >> +/* { dg-do compile {
I may have submitted this shortly before the Caudren, and it got lost.
This patch adds 4 additional configuration switches, that allow the person
building the compiler to add additional prefixes to search for additional
executables and startfiles.
If the backend has the appropriate tweaks install
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:41 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 04:13:20PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> Jack Howarth writes:
>>>
>>> >Currently the new testcase for gcc.target/i386/pr53249.c is failing
>>> > on darwin due to th
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
>
> I see your point. How about we guard these changes with a flag, say
> -gless-jumpy, so that people can always choose between better coverage
> and less jumpy gdb behavior (it's also important for some other
> clients like AutoFDO). I will have
Applied to GCC trunk.
Gerald
2012-11-01 Gerald Pfeifer
* doc/standards.texi (Standards): Adjust reference to Go
specification.
Index: doc/standards.texi
===
--- doc/standards.texi (revision 193072)
+++ doc/stand
The patch has been checked in.
Committed revision 193074.
Thanks,
Wei.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Wei Mi wrote:
> Ok, I will check in the patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Wei.
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>>>
Applied.
Gerald
Index: gupc.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/projects/gupc.html,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -3 -p -r1.6 gupc.html
--- gupc.html 10 Jan 2012 00:56:57 - 1.6
+++ gupc.html 1 Nov 2012 23:01:35
On 2012-11-02 02:44, Marc Glisse wrote:
> 2012-11-01 Marc Glisse
>
> PR middle-end/55001
>
> gcc/
> tree-vect-generic.c (expand_vector_condition): New function.
> (expand_vector_operations_1): Call it.
>
> testsuite/
> g++.dg/ext/vector19.C: Remove target restrictions.
> g
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
>>
>> I see your point. How about we guard these changes with a flag, say
>> -gless-jumpy, so that people can always choose between better coverage
>> and less jumpy gdb behavior (it's als
Looks like Gelato is gone, not surprising given the outlooks
(or lack thereof) for ia64 itself, so I applied the following.
Remove Gelato reference and abbreviate the description of the
ia64-improvements branch.
Gerald
Index: svn.html
=
I checked in this patch as obvious. It fixes PR 55103 which is a compiler
abort on MIPS with the -mips16 flag. After committing I realized I forgot
to put the bug number in the ChangeLog, I will update PR 55103 by hand.
Steve Ellcey
sell...@mips.com
2012-11-01 Steve Ellcey
* target
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:38:13PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr53249.c (revision 193061)
>> >> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr53249.c (working copy)
>> >> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>> >> -/* { dg-do compi
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
>>>
>>> I see your point. How about we guard these changes with a flag, say
>>> -gless-jumpy, so that people can always choose
I would like to introduce filename-based shared library versioning (known as
the "soname" in ELF world) for AIX, activated by the '--enable-aix-soname'
configure flag.
(libgcc_s) Optional filename-based shared library versioning on AIX.
* Makefile.in (enable_aix_soname): Define.
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Michael Meissner wrote:
> * doc/install.texi (--with-extra-prefix=): Document new configure
> switches.
> (--with-extra-exec-prefix=): Likewise.
> (--with-extra-startfile-prefix=): Likewise.
> (--with-extra-rpath-prefix=): Likewise.
+On powerpc64-l
Unlike other webmasters, Sun's/Oracle's actually took care of a
redirect. Still we should update the link, and that was "recent"
many years ago, so I adjusted this on the way.
Applied.
Gerald
2012-11-02 Gerald Pfeifer
* faq.html: Update reference to Java language specification.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
I see your point. How about we guard these changes with a flag
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> 2012-11-01 Gerald Pfeifer
>
> * doc/standards.texi (Standards): Adjust reference to Go
> specification.
Turns out there is another reference on our web page.
Fixed thusly.
Gerald
Index: readings.html
===
"Apache 2 Test Page powered by CentOS" is not exactly what I expect
from a web page references from install.texi. Either those guys are
belly up or their IT is broken. Either way, the link is gone.
Gerald
2012-11-02 Gerald Pfeifer
* doc/install.texi (Specific): Remove moxie web refe
On 18 September 2012 12:58, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> This is a relatively large patch which tackles the difficult issue of
> generating more sloc information in front-ends (in particular C and C++
> front-ends), so that "static analyzers" based on GCC can get more useful
> and detailed information.
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:38:13PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:41 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Jack Howarth
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 04:13:20PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> >>> Jack Howarth writes:
> >>>
> >>> >Currently the new t
So that the libstdc++ guys cannot complain I am only spending time
on Java. ;-)
There is a _lot_ left to do, especially around the imported lwg
pages; those are in a vary bade state. Any volunteer for that
one?
Applied.
Gerald
2012-11-02 Gerald Pfeifer
* doc/xml/manual/codecvt.xml:
On 2 November 2012 00:29, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> There is a _lot_ left to do, especially around the imported lwg
> pages; those are in a vary bade state. Any volunteer for that
> one?
They're imported, do we really want to tweak them? And then tweak them
again next time we import them?
If the
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> There is a _lot_ left to do, especially around the imported lwg
>> pages; those are in a vary bade state. Any volunteer for that
>> one?
> They're imported, do we really want to tweak them? And then tweak them
> again next time we import them?
>
> If
This fixes the new LWG issue 2210 and only uses allocator::construct()
for the elements not the nodes.
2012-11-02 Jonathan Wakely
* include/bits/forward_list.h (forward_list(size_type)): Add missing
allocator parameter.
(_Fwd_list_node_base): Use NSDMI and define constr
Hi,
I back ported revision 192603/192604 to arm-embedded-4_7 branch as r193088.
Thanks.
r193088 | amker | 2012-11-02 10:15:42 +0800 (五, 02 11月 2012) | 39 lines
Backport from mainline r192604
2012-10-19 Bin Cheng
* common.opt (flag_ira_hoist_pressure): New.
* d
Changing the option is part of the plan.
Dodji, can you make the option change part of one the patches (e.g,
the first one that introduces it) -- there seems no need for a
separate patch for it.
thanks,
David
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Konstantin Serebryany
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 201
101 - 142 of 142 matches
Mail list logo