ok.
David
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Rong Xu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch is for google-4_6 branch only.
> It fixes the broken -S in streaming LIPO mode.
>
> Tested with bootstrap.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 2012-04-25 Rong Xu
>
> * gcc/gcc.c (ripa_lto_spec): Support -S.
> (cc1_optio
On 04/20/12 18:58, Alan Modra wrote:
> + add_reg_note (insn, REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR, set);
> + RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1;
You're probably better off using REG_CFA_REGISTER here,
rather than making dwarf2cfi.c guess what you meant.
The guessing is rather tuned to prologues...
r~
Hi,
currently when -frange-check is enabled, we check for overflow when
doing a formatted read of an integer value. This check, however, is
against the Fortran numerical model (see 13.4 in F2008), which defines
a symmetric interval [-huge(), huge()], whereas all targets gfortran
supports use a two
PING!
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 01:18, Janne Blomqvist
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the attached patch implements some fixes for handling STATUS="SCRATCH" files.
>
> - Currently, we check GFORTRAN_TMPDIR, TMP, and TEMP environment
> variables, but not the POSIX and GNU standard TMPDIR. As specifying a
> tempor
PING!
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 00:46, Janne Blomqvist
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the attached patch implements a few fixes and cleanups for the MOD and
> MODULO intrinsics.
>
> - When the arguments are constant, use mpfr_fmod instead of the naive
> algorithms which are numerically unstable for large argumen
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:39 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:24 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Sriraman Tallam
>>> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for all the comments. I have made all the cha
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:39 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:24 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Sriraman Tallam
wrote:
> Hi,
Thanks for your feedback Richard,
On Apr 25, 2012, at 16:16 , Richard Guenther wrote:
> I think much better would be to simply disallow any toplevel
> VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR of BLKmode,
> Does that fix your problems, too? If so I prefer that.
Hmm, I think that this would fix the particular testscas
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:28 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:39 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Sriraman Tallam
>>> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:24 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2
On 25/04/12 11:57, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> >> Hmm. I'm not sure we can conclude that they have the same value!
>>> >>
>>> >> +int bar (int);
>>> >> +void baz (int);
>>> >> +void bla (int);
>>> >> +
>>> >> +void
>>> >> +foo (int y)
>>> >> +{
>>> >> + int a;
>>> >> + if (y == 6)
>>> >> +{
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:53:36 +0100
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 25 April 2012 08:33, Igor Zamyatin wrote:
> > This testcase is reported as failed on x86
>
> Yep.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-04/msg02547.html
>
> Benjamin?
Ouch.
Sorry about this guys, of course it wasn't thi
On 04/25/12 06:45, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 04/13/12 03:46, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Aldy Hernandezwrote:
+ /* ?? Perhaps we should cache this somewhere in the BB, or are
+ multiple levels of
Hey hey! Looking good Dodji. Can't wait to use this stuff.
> There are so many libstdc++ tests that were failing because of that
> benign issue that I preferred to just run them with
> -ftrack-macro-expansion diabled, after inspecting each of them to be
> sure there was nothing more serious under
Hi H.J,
Could you please review this patch for AVX2 check?
* config/i386/i386-cpuinfo.c (FEATURE_AVX2): New enum value.
(get_available_features): New argument. Check for AVX2.
(__cpu_indicator_init): Modify call to get_available_features
.
* doc/extend.texi: Doc
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> Hi H.J,
>
> Could you please review this patch for AVX2 check?
>
> * config/i386/i386-cpuinfo.c (FEATURE_AVX2): New enum value.
> (get_available_features): New argument. Check for AVX2.
> (__cpu_indicator_init): Modif
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This patch adds DW_OP_GNU_addr_index to dwarf2.h.
>
> Ok to commit?
>
> 2012-04-18 Doug Evans
>
> * dwarf2.h (dwarf_location_atom): Add DW_OP_GNU_addr_index.
>
> Index: include/dwarf2.h
> ==
Ping ..
David
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Ping ..
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> Ping ..
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>>> Build the test case in the patch file with -finstrument-functions, the
A couple of months ago Kai Tietz fixed several tests for MS layout of
bitfields, including:
2012-02-23 Kai Tietz
* gcc.dg/bf-ms-layout-2.c: Adjust offsets to fit ms-bitfield
structure-layout.
He missed changes to gcc.dg/bf-ms-layout.c which has the same layouts
as bf-ms-la
The subject line points out the bug. This combination of
constraints is invalid, and almost no other target has it (and
none together with strict_low_part): you can't reload a
read/write operand (one with a "+" modifier, such as a
strict_low_part destination) for which there is an input-only
match
> Ping.
> This is approved on the binutils side.
> I just need approval on the gcc side.
My understanding is that a patch to sync binutils/include and
gcc/include falls under the "trivial and obvious" rule. True?
-cary
Patch committed.
Thanks,
-Sri.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:52 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>> Hi H.J,
>>
>> Could you please review this patch for AVX2 check?
>>
>> * config/i386/i386-cpuinfo.c (FEATURE_AVX2): New enum value.
>> (get
... putting in line breaks for doxygen, so that each base class is on a
separate line.
-benjamin2012-04-25 Benjamin Kosnik
* include/bits/hashtable.h: Adjust doxygen markup for base classes.
* include/bits/hashtable_policy.h: Same.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/hashtable.h b/li
This patch to libgo ensures that syscall.SO_REUSEPORT is defined. It
fixes the only use of it in the standard library to check whether it has
a valid value before using it. This should fix the build on Solaris 9.
Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Committed to mainline
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis
wrote:
>
> Thanks. Tom, I am satisfied with the diagnostic part.
> I think the CPP part makes sense but it is your call.
Hi, Tom, just a quick checkin to see if you've had a chance to review this, yet.
Thanks,
Ollie
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 02:00:48PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/20/12 18:58, Alan Modra wrote:
> > + add_reg_note (insn, REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR, set);
> > + RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1;
>
> You're probably better off using REG_CFA_REGISTER here,
> rather than making dwarf2c
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 04:56:17PM -0700, Doug Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
> > This patch adds DW_OP_GNU_addr_index to dwarf2.h.
> >
> > Ok to commit?
> >
> > 2012-04-18 Doug Evans
> >
> > * dwarf2.h (dwarf_location_atom): Add DW_OP_GNU_addr_index.
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
You can download an AVX2 emulator (SDE) from
http://software.intel.com/en-us/avx/
to test AVX2 binaries.
Hello,
not related to this specific patch, but do you have a dejagnu board
description that you could share that enables running the compiler
normal
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
