Hello world,
this fixes a 4.7/4.8 regression with a bogus warning for variables
which were excluded from being imported by "use, only" if they
were in a common block inside the module.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk and for 4.7 after a few days?
Thomas
2012-03-25 Thomas Koenig
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have
any questions, send them to .)
A new POT file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been made available
to the language teams for translation. It is archived as:
http://translationproject.org/POT-files/c
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have
any questions, send them to .)
A new POT file for textual domain 'gcc' has been made available
to the language teams for translation. It is archived as:
http://translationproject.org/POT-files/gcc-
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
As I mentioned in my patch to add -std=c++1y, I've been working on a proposal
for the next standard to support return type deduction for normal functions,
not just lambdas. This patch implements that proposal.
Nice. I like the way you seem to be goin
Hi,
while backporting predict.c fix I forgot to backport followup fix for a typo
causing fnsplit
test failure on some setups.
Bootstrapped/regtested and comitted.
Honza
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 185774)
+++ Chang
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the German team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/de.po
(This file, 'gcc-4.7.0.de.po', has just
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:17:10 +0200 (CEST)
Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> > As I mentioned in my patch to add -std=c++1y, I've been working on a
> > proposal
> > for the next standard to support return type deduction for normal
> > functions,
> > not just l
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 12:17:10 +0200 (CEST)
Marc Glisse wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
As I mentioned in my patch to add -std=c++1y, I've been working on a proposal
for the next standard to support return type deduction for no
Hi,
this PR is about odd inconsistencies about comdat variables being or not being
optimized out at -O0 with LTO. This is a side effect of the logic where COMDAT
variables are output on demand at -O0, while static variables are output
always. This logic is here from pre-cgraph times where we did
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been submitted
by the Japanese team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/cpplib/ja.po
(This file, 'cpplib-4.7.0.ja.po'
cpplib-4.7.0.ja.po.gz
Description: Binary data
The Translation Project robot, in the
name of your translation coordinator.
This has been introduced by
2012-03-16 Andrew John Hughes
* Makefile.am: Add natVMConsole.cc.
:
* java/io/VMConsole.h: Initial generation.
* java/io/VMConsole.java: Copied from classpath/vm/reference.
* java/io/natVMConsole.cc: Implemented readPassword
Hi Joseph,
I need to support InverseMask(XXX) in options without the corresponding
Mask(XXX) since XXX is never set directly via a command line option. This
patch adds a MaskNeeded property which turns InverseMask(XXX) into
the inverse version of Mask(XXX), which allocates a unique bit and defines
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> - a first goal is simple functions, with a single return statement (which
> may even often be the only statement).
yes, this is something we tend to forget: simple things should stay simple, no
matter how clever we think we can get. for that
Now that rest_of_record_type_compilation only deals with the generation of XVE
types, we can return early for types that don't need one.
Tested on i586-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2012-03-25 Eric Botcazou
* gcc-interface/utils.c (finish_record_type): Return early for padded
There is no need to generate both an XVS and an XVE type for the same record
type; we can limit ourselves to the XVS type, which is the simplest of the two
types.
Tested on i586-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2012-03-25 Eric Botcazou
* gcc-interface/utils.c (add_parallel_type
We have a call to builtin_alloca_with_align:
S10b.27_153 = .builtin_alloca_with_align (5, 8);
and CCP replaces it with a static allocation:
S10b.27_153 = &TMP;
and is trying to add a special out-of-scope CLOBBER for the new variable TMP,
under the assumption that every call to builtin_alloc
This has probably no effects in practice, but for the sake of consistency...
Tested on i586-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2012-03-25 Eric Botcazou
* gcc-interface/decl.c (gnat_to_gnu_entity) : Copy
the TYPE_PACKED flag from the base type.
--
Eric Botcazou
Index: gcc
Hello,
I forgot to update changes.html when the -ftrack-macro-expansion and
Wunused-local-typedefs changes went in.
Fixed thus. I hope it is not too late, now that 4.7 is out.
OK for CVS head?
* htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html: Update for
-ftrack-macro-expansion and -Wunused-local-
> This patch propagates execution count of thee case labels of a
> switch-case statement after its expansion. Bootstraps and all
> tests pass. OK for trunk?
Hi,
while this is resonable thing to do, I belive it would make most sense
to make switch lowering at gimple level: i.e. reorganize the exist
On 03/14/2012 12:22 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:00 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch adds --with-abi= support to x86_64-*-* to configure GCC with
>>
>> --with-abi=x32
>> --with-abi=mx32
>> --with-multilib-list=mx32
>>
>> to set the default ABI to x32. In i386 backend,
Hello,
This patch removes all calls to assemble_external from places other
than final.c and MI-thunk generators.
This is step 2 toward addressing PR17982 on the trunk for GCC 4.8. The
next, and final, step will be to change pending_assemble_externals to
pending_assemble_visibility, and fold assem
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> This patch propagates execution count of thee case labels of a
>> switch-case statement after its expansion. Bootstraps and all
>> tests pass. OK for trunk?
>
> Hi,
> while this is resonable thing to do, I belive it would make most sense
> to
23 matches
Mail list logo
