On 01/22/2012 03:38 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Sorry I didn't notice this patch until now; please CC me on C++ patches,
or at least mention C++ in the subject line.
+ tree expr = NULL;
+ append_to_statement_list (*block, &expr);
+ *block = expr;
Rather than doing this dance here
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 05:20:02PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> This patch backports the fix from trunk:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770
>
> for google/gcc-4_6_2-mobile branch. This is needed to support C++
> global constructors/destructiors on Android/x86. OK for
> google/gcc-
Build and regtested on x86-64-linux.
OK for the (4.8?) trunk?
Tobias
intern-generic.diff
Description: application/unknown
Dear Tobias,
I saw Nasser's posting and the subsequent correspondence on clf.
That's a pretty fast response!
I think that this is OK for trunk, since it is only a change of
standard for this error.
Cheers
Paul
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Build and regtested on x86
The patch consists of two parts:
* The pointer check in gfc_check_vardef_context didn't honour
polymorphic variables
* Passing a TYPE to a CLASS is not allowed if CLASS is a pointer or
allocatable as the actual argument cannot change its effective type.
However, if the dummy is an intent(in)
I noted that the documentation for the IRA-related command-line options
and parameters needed fairly extensive copy-editing. In addition to
correcting some English grammar problems, I have reorganized some of the
discussion as well to make it easier to follow.
I've checked this in -- maybe it
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> * doc/invoke.texi: Correct hyphenation of "floating point",
>> "double precision", and related terminology throughout the file.
> I believe we should document this then, as well, per the patch below?
>
> Any objections / thoughts?
I know when
