ok for google branches.
David
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> Add new target builtins __builtin_cpu_is_intel_corei7 and
> __builtin_cpu_is_amdfam10.
>
> * config/i386/i386-cpuinfo.c (__processor_model): Add new members
> __cpu_is_intel_corei7 and __cpu_is_
ok for google branches.
David
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:05 PM, wrote:
> I have uploaded a new patch set with all the mentioned changes made. If
> a function has the target attribute it will not be touched by the
> autoclone pass.
>
> Also fixed some test cases which were broken because the clon
On Dec 16, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I think using the "company" part of the target triplet to mean anything
> should be avoided;
I disagree. Think of the string as a key that subscripts a database which has
precooked answers that are used instead of probing for the answers whi
On Dec 16, 2011, at 5:43 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> When I configure GCC with i686-linux-android target, don't I get
> linux as vendor and android OS?
No:
$ ./config.sub i686-linux-android
i686-pc-linux-android
pc is the vendor, though, I'd claim this is a misnomer and wrong. A cell phone
isn't PC c
On 8 December 2011 14:02, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> Hi again guys,
>
> After the previous patch, there's still another bug remaining in the Ada
> makefile, relating to how it builds and installs the gnat/gnarl shared
> libraries.
>
> Windows doesn't have any concept of an rpath in executables, nor
> I am happily using this patch and await this to be committed.
Only after the import library issue is addressed. What do the other libraries
bundled with GCC do here?
--
Eric Botcazou
Andrew Pinski writes:
> Index: testsuite/gcc.target/mips/octeon2-lx-1.c
> ===
> --- testsuite/gcc.target/mips/octeon2-lx-1.c (revision 0)
> +++ testsuite/gcc.target/mips/octeon2-lx-1.c (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* { dg-do c
Ping for this prepare_shrink_wrap patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00274.html
It fixes some wrong-code regressions on MIPS16.
Richard
Ping for this reload patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00266.html
or perhaps the original:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg00663.html
which fixes some wrong-code regressions on mips64-linux-gnu.
Richard
lower-subreg.c:can_decompose_p uses the following condition to test
whether a multiword hard register can be decomposed into words:
return (validate_subreg (word_mode, GET_MODE (x), x, UNITS_PER_WORD)
&& HARD_REGNO_MODE_OK (regno, word_mode));
This doesn't work reliably on
libgcc wasn't building the soft-float routines for mips-sde-elf,
because the config.host stanza removed t-mips from tmake_file.
Tested on mips-sde-elf and applied. I should have noticed
this when the patches were posted for review, sorry.
Richard
libgcc/
* config.host (mips*-sde-elf*,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 06:53, wrote:
> Yes, for that particular function on Linux/amd64 I see
> artificial+ignored and is_thunk==0.
>
> So is it LGTY?
Yes.
Diego.
> Putting into gcc/cp/config-lang.in is a layering violation, it's true. But
> until there's another instance that needs handling, it seems premature to
> build infrastructure to handle this. And it's only one line after all...
I don't know exactly why, but this breaks bootstrap on some machines
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Putting into gcc/cp/config-lang.in is a layering violation, it's true. But
>> until there's another instance that needs handling, it seems premature to
>> build infrastructure to handle this. And it's only one line after all...
>
> I don't
On 12/17/2011 06:19 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Putting into gcc/cp/config-lang.in is a layering violation, it's true. But
>> until there's another instance that needs handling, it seems premature to
>> build infrastructure to handle this. And it's only one line after all...
>
> I don't know exa
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 08:07 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> + return \"\\
> +mova\\t1f, r0\\n\\
> +\\t\\t%2, %4\\n\\
> +\\tmov\\tr15, r1\\n\\
> +\\tmov\\t#(0f-1f), r15\\n\\
> +0:\\tmov.\\t@%1, %0\\n\\
> +\\tcmp/eq\\t%0, %4\\n\\
> +\\tbf\\t1f\\n\\
> +\\tmov.\\t%3, @%1\\n\\
> +\\t.align\\t2\\n\\
> +1:\\
Richard Henderson writes:
> There's no "good" place for this. The description in Makefile.def that
> libitm uses c++ is only used insofar as the dependencies for libitm -- it's
> built after libstdc++ as the language support library. If we put this into
> the toplevel configure.ac directly,
This testcase was aborting when we tried to check ENUM_UNDERLYING_TYPE
on a non-enum. Fixed by checking the tree code first.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit b01c647f6754097ac85e4ca1d7c80c1da8edc660
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Sat Dec 17 09:30:43 2011 -0500
PR c++/
Enclosed for review and inclusion on the google/main and google/4_6 trees is the
first patch for the debugfission project. It includes producing a complete and
correct set of .debug_pubnames and .debug_pubtypes, as well as switching the
default to generate .debug_pubnames and .debug_pubtypes.
It
Based on Paolo's comments I am dropping the changes to
baseline_symbols.txt. As far as minor version, I am bumping it up to
18. Assuming that this patch will be able to go in gcc 4.8 (with minor
version 18), I want to keep it at the same version in google/main and
google/gcc-4_6.
Bootstraps and no
The attached patch should fix the align 2 issues mentioned before and
also fixes the ior fetchop_name. It should be "or" instead of "ior".
I'm not sure whether it requires re-testing.
Just in case now running:
make -k -check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml/-msoft-atomic,
-m2/-mb/-m
ok.
David
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
> Based on Paolo's comments I am dropping the changes to
> baseline_symbols.txt. As far as minor version, I am bumping it up to
> 18. Assuming that this patch will be able to go in gcc 4.8 (with minor
> version 18), I want to keep
On 12/17/2011 12:13 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
> @@ -90,13 +90,13 @@
>return \"\\
> mova\\t1f, r0\\n\\
> \\t\\t%2, %4\\n\\
> +\\t.align\\t2\\n\\
The other thing that should be remembered is that inside a { }
block you don't need to double-quote all the \'s.
r~
2011/12/17 Jason Merrill :
> This testcase was aborting when we tried to check ENUM_UNDERLYING_TYPE on a
> non-enum. Fixed by checking the tree code first.
Ahem ... thank you !
--
Fabien
Checked in.
Thanks,
-Sri.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> ok for google branches.
>
> David
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>> Add new target builtins __builtin_cpu_is_intel_corei7 and
>> __builtin_cpu_is_amdfam10.
>>
>> * config/i
Committed to google 4_6 branch.
Thanks,
-Sri.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> ok for google branches.
>
> David
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:05 PM, wrote:
>> I have uploaded a new patch set with all the mentioned changes made. If
>> a function has the target attri
Oleg Endo wrote:
> The attached patch should fix the align 2 issues mentioned before and
> also fixes the ior fetchop_name. It should be "or" instead of "ior".
You are right about that nop shouldn't be inserted after
write-back. Thanks for pointing out my thinko.
Your patch doesn't work because
In C++11 an enum can be used in a nested-name-specifier, but it still
isn't valid for a pointer-to-member.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit 80c46fcfb6ea29a6566b285cf94e519ec414d2e9
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Sat Dec 17 15:39:56 2011 -0500
PR c++/51588
* parser
* doc/xml/manual/iterators.xml: Replace "sect1" with "section".
* doc/xml/manual/algorithms.xml: Likewise.
* doc/html/manual/iterators.html: Likewise.
* doc/html/manual/algorithms.html: Likewise.
Fixes some errors probably introduced by s/section/sect1/
Rather than
Hello,
The attached patch is a resubmission following comments made by Ayal
and Richard.
Tested and bootstrap with the other patches in the series on
ppc64-redhat-linux, enabling SMS on loops with SC 1.
Comments are welcome.
Thanks,
Revital
2011-12-18 Richard Sandiford
R
On 2011/12/17 06:21 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 03:16 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
>> Hi, under powerpc targets, using -mrelocatable under some cases triggers
>> an error during final assembly generation: rs6000_assemble_integer()
>> calls varasm.c:unlikely_text_section_p(), and the c
Hello,
>> This patch support the estimation of register pressure in SMS.
>> Although GCC is in stage 3 I would appreciate comments on it.
>> Thanks to Richard and Ayal for discussing the implementation and their
>> insights.
>>
>> This part of the patch enables iterating on the partial schedule i
> 2011-12-17 Sterling Augustine
>
> * gcc/dwarf2out.c (is_cu_die, is_namespace_die, is_class_die): New
> functions.
> (add_pubname): Call is_namespace_die, is_cu_die, and is_class_die in
> conditional.
> (add_enumerator_pubname): New function.
> (add_pu
33 matches
Mail list logo
