Re: Allow more PowerPC sibling calls

2011-04-21 Thread Alan Modra
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 01:29:14PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:29:17AM -0700, Nathan Froyd wrote: > > Could I request that you use FOREACH_FUNCTION_ARGS in these two cases? > > The conversion is trivial, and avoiding more exposed TYPE_ARG_TYPES > > calls is a good thing. >

Re: [ARM] [3/3] Implement TARGET_BUILTIN_DECL

2011-04-21 Thread Jie Zhang
Thank you for review, update and commit this patch set! Jie On 04/18/2011 10:04 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 15:44 +0800, Jie Zhang wrote: This patch implements TARGET_BUILTIN_DECL for ARM. With the changes of the previous two patches, this one is straightforward. Is it

Re: [PATCH PING] c++-specific bits of tree-slimming patches

2011-04-21 Thread Jason Merrill
On 04/21/2011 10:55 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote: On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:49:05PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: Hunh. How does that work? They fill in CASE_LABEL later? Can that be changed? Yeah, tree-eh.c:lower_try_finally_switch. I don't know how easy it is to fix; it certainly looks non-triv

Re: FDO usage: -Wcoverage-mismatch should not ignore -Wno-error

2011-04-21 Thread Xinliang David Li
Please review the new patch. Thanks, David On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Xinliang David Li wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Joseph S. Myers >> wrote: >> > On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Xinliang David Li wrote: >> > >> >> 2011-04-18  Neil Vac

Re: [PATCH PING] c++-specific bits of tree-slimming patches

2011-04-21 Thread Mike Stump
On Apr 21, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 04/21/2011 10:55 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:49:05PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: >>> Hunh. How does that work? They fill in CASE_LABEL later? Can that be >>> changed? >> >> Yeah, tree-eh.c:lower_try_finally_switch.

<    1   2