This patch to the Go frontend uses the backend interface for the send
statement. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline.
Ian
diff -r 4bbcd245a88a go/expressions.cc
--- a/go/expressions.cc Thu Apr 14 21:05:53 2011 -0700
+++ b/go/expressions.cc Fri Ap
On 04/12/2011 08:22 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 04:00:45PM -0500, Pat Haugen wrote:
> --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (revision 172327)
> +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (working copy)
> @@ -7976,7 +7976,7 @@ call_ABI_of_interest (tree fndecl)
> return true;
>
>
This patch to the Go frontends adds a convenience function
compound_statement to build a statement list from two statements.
Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Committed to mainline.
Ian
2011-04-15 Ian Lance Taylor
* go-gcc.cc (Gcc_backend::compound_statem
The attached patch fixes an ICE for scalar coarray with -fcoarray=lib.
Additionally, I have change the dg-do compile into a run, which I forgot
to do when initially submitting the patch.
Committed as Rev. 172522.
Tobias
PS: All coarray*.f90 dg-do run test also work with "-fcoarray=lib
-lcaf_
Hi,
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> > I'll make the DECL_EXPR conditional on the size being variable. As
> > Tobias already okayed the patch I'm planning to check in the slightly
> > modified variant as below, after a new round of testing.
>
> Thats A-OK
r172524
Ciao,
Michael.
Hi all,
the following patch fixes an issue with a multiple decl for procedures
with procedure dummy arguments. Without the patch, multiple declarations
are generated, which causes link failures ("euler" is optimized away)
with -fwhole-program. (Thanks goes to Richard for spotting the problem
I was curious if anyone was still looking at this problem? I see this
on IA64 HP-UX in 32 bit mode where ptr_mode(SImode) != Pmode(DImode).
As H.J. points out, expand_expr_real_2 is calling simplify_gen_subreg
(expr.c, line 7366) and at that point op0 is "(label_ref/v:DI 32)" and
innermode is SImo
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:30:01AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> I have no idea why there should be a problem with inlining (cf. deleted
> comment), but removing that part did not give any test suite failure
> (check-gfortran + libgomp's check). Additionally, I have build and run
> the Polyhe
Hi Steve,
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I was curious if anyone was still looking at this problem?
I didn't because it occurred only on an experimental port.
> I see this on IA64 HP-UX in 32 bit mode
Which means it also occurs with something else now (well, ia64 hp-ux, but
at lea
This is a typo/thinko introduced with one of my recent scheduler
patches. Rather than flag_sched_pressure we have to use
sched_pressure_p, which accurately is only set during sched1.
Bootstrapped and tested on i686-linux, and committed as obvious.
Bernd
Index: ChangeLog
==
Applied (with a few formatting tweaks).
Thanks,
Jason
Hi,
tested x86_64-linux, committed mainline and 4_6-branch.
Paolo.
//
2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler
Paolo Carlini
PR libstdc++/48635
* include/bits/unique_ptr.h (unique_ptr<>::operator=(unique_ptr&&),
unique_ptr<>::operator=(unique_ptr<>&&),
Hi,
tested x86_64-linux, committed mainline and 4_6-branch.
Paolo.
2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler
Paolo Carlini
PR libstdc++/48631
* include/bits/unique_ptr.h (default_delete<_Tp[]>): Add deleted
function call operator.
* tes
Hello,
> If it's for debugging, can you use a --parm instead (like
> modulo-sched-min-sc or similar)?
>
I think I can use --param for debugging purposes in this case.
(I might add modulo-sched-max-sc as well)
Thanks,
Revital
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Revital
>>
>> Changelog:
>>
>>
Hi Richard
Thank you for the detailed explanation. It sounds like an inherent
difficulty of rtl passes. Then the only opportunity is ldrb/strb
instructions because they never affect cc registers.
thanks
Carrot
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 21
Hi!
As the attached testcase shows, while the current detection of what
shifts are by scalar and what shifts are by vector shift count
may work well for loop vectorizer (vect_internal_def being vector
shift, vect_external_def or vect_constant_def scalar shift),
it is incorrect for SLP, where vect_
Steve Kargl wrote:
The comment comes from r170414, which suggest there is a problem if a
procedure is in an argument list, and that procedure gets in-lined.
[...]
Perhaps, looking at the -fdump-tree-original on whole_file_32.f90 may
shed light on the situation.
Well, it does not. The function
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo