Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL

Hi again. Here it is my first try at this. I have changed the list to gcc-patches, I don't know if cross post would be correct. Please, note that this patch is not finished: the new test cases are still missing, and expect format mistakes, misspellings and the like... A few comments: 1. I'm not

Re: [PING][PATCH, testsuite] Update gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c SIZE values for powerpc

On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 23:50 +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: > > Just guessing at the numbers, does the following patch fix the > > failures for you? > > As I am currently bootstrapping gcc, I cannot regtest right now, but running > the > test manually I get 256 at -m32 (I guess this is right) w

[PATCH] gitignore: ignore site.{bak,exp} treewide

These files are never checked into cvs, and are generated by most testsuites, so ignore them. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger 2011-03-28 Mike Frysinger * .gitignore: Ignore site.bak and site.exp. --- .gitignore |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/

[gc-improv] [PATCH] Separate function RTL memory

This is a first attempt to separate function RTL and make it default. This patch is enough for --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c to complete on Linux x64, but there still remains some RTL that is allocated on function obstack when it should be permanent instead. The patch disables sharin

Re: [PING][PATCH, testsuite] Update gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c SIZE values for powerpc

> Ok, slightly updated. How about this? ... It did not work either at -m64, but the following one seems to work (manual testing): --- /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c2011-03-28 20:27:57.0 +0200 +++ /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c 2011-03-2

<    1   2