Re: wide-int testing results

2013-11-07 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 7, 2013, at 9:51 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > pdp11 and picochip-elf don't build on mainline due to: > > gcc/target-def.h:69:34: error: ‘default_stabs_asm_out_destructor’ was not > declared in this scope > # define TARGET_ASM_DESTRUCTOR default_stabs_asm_out_destructor Fixed: 2

Re: wide-int testing results

2013-11-07 Thread Richard Sandiford
Kenneth Zadeck writes: > I doubt that this list is comprehensive. Hmm? It was supposed to be one target for each CPU, so if you think I've missed one, please point it out. It certainly wasn't supposed to be every target triple that gcc supports. Even one target per CPU was useful, since quite

Re: wide-int testing results

2013-11-07 Thread Kenneth Zadeck
I doubt that this list is comprehensive. When i many of these things a long time ago, I was not that interested in bit for bit compatibly as long as was never introducing any problems.in some cases it would have been hard to replicate some of the end cases with the wide-int code. On 11/0

wide-int testing results

2013-11-07 Thread Richard Sandiford
I wanted to make sure that each backend still builds with wide-int and that there weren't any unexplained changes in assembly output. I arbitrarily picked one target for each CPU: aarch64-linux-gnueabi alpha-linux-gnu arc-elf arm-linux-gnueabi avr-rtems bfin-elf c6x-elf cr16-elf cris-elf