On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 26 July 2016 at 17:07, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> The following is an interesting case which broke stor-layout.c.
> >> The patch warned for the following call to be dead from
> >> bit_fiel
On 26 July 2016 at 17:07, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> The following is an interesting case which broke stor-layout.c.
>> The patch warned for the following call to be dead from
>> bit_field_mode_iterator::next_mode() to get_mode_alignment ():
>>
>>
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> The following is an interesting case which broke stor-layout.c.
> The patch warned for the following call to be dead from
> bit_field_mode_iterator::next_mode() to get_mode_alignment ():
>
> /* Stop if the mode requires too much alignment.
The following is an interesting case which broke stor-layout.c.
The patch warned for the following call to be dead from
bit_field_mode_iterator::next_mode() to get_mode_alignment ():
/* Stop if the mode requires too much alignment. */
if (GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (m_mode) > m_align