On 11/10/20 7:42 PM, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> on 2020/11/10 涓嬪崍7:31, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As Lyon pointed out, the newly introduced test case
>>> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr96789.c fails on arm-none-linux-gnue
"Kewen.Lin" writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> on 2020/11/10 锟斤拷锟斤拷7:31, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As Lyon pointed out, the newly introduced test case
>>> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr96789.c fails on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.
>>> Loop vectorizer is ab
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the review!
on 2020/11/10 下午7:31, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As Lyon pointed out, the newly introduced test case
>> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr96789.c fails on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.
>> Loop vectorizer is able to vectorize the two loops which
>>
"Kewen.Lin" writes:
> Hi,
>
> As Lyon pointed out, the newly introduced test case
> gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr96789.c fails on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.
> Loop vectorizer is able to vectorize the two loops which
> operate on array tmp with load_lanes feature support. It
> makes dse3 get unexpected inputs
Hi,
As Lyon pointed out, the newly introduced test case
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr96789.c fails on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.
Loop vectorizer is able to vectorize the two loops which
operate on array tmp with load_lanes feature support. It
makes dse3 get unexpected inputs and do nothing.
This patch is to
