Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t

2012-04-20 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! Sorry for the delay. On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 05:34:30 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Thomas Schwinge writes: > > > libgcc/ > > * config/alpha/linux-unwind.h (alpha_fallback_frame_state): Use > > siginfo_t instead of struct siginfo. > > * config/bfin/linux-unwind.h (bfin_fallback_

Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t

2012-03-27 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Thomas Schwinge writes: > libgcc/ > * config/alpha/linux-unwind.h (alpha_fallback_frame_state): Use > siginfo_t instead of struct siginfo. > * config/bfin/linux-unwind.h (bfin_fallback_frame_state): Likewise. > * config/i386/linux-unwind.h (x86_fallback_frame_state): Likew

Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t

2012-03-27 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! Ping. On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:56:04 +0100, I wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:57:00 -0400, Carlos O'Donell > wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Thomas Schwinge > > wrote: > > > On 26 Feb 2012 18:17:52 -, drep...@sourceware.org wrote: > > >> http://sources.redhat.com/git/gitweb.

Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t

2012-03-21 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:57:00 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Thomas Schwinge > wrote: > > On 26 Feb 2012 18:17:52 -, drep...@sourceware.org wrote: > >> http://sources.redhat.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=4efeffc1d583597e4f52985b9747269e4

Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t (was: GNU C Library master sources branch, master, updated. glibc-2.15-229-g4efeffc)

2012-03-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 15 March 2012 11:57:00 Carlos O'Donell wrote: > We should be rebuilding *all* of userspace when glibc changes. It > would be nice if we setup an OpenEmbedded system to rebuild as much of > x86-64 userspace as possible against a new glibc and check for > regressions. emerge -e world -mi

Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t (was: GNU C Library master sources branch, master, updated. glibc-2.15-229-g4efeffc)

2012-03-15 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Thomas Schwinge > wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On 26 Feb 2012 18:17:52 -, drep...@sourceware.org wrote: >>> http://sources.redhat.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=4efeffc1d583597e4f52985b9747269e47

Re: struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t (was: GNU C Library master sources branch, master, updated. glibc-2.15-229-g4efeffc)

2012-03-15 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > On 26 Feb 2012 18:17:52 -, drep...@sourceware.org wrote: >> http://sources.redhat.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=4efeffc1d583597e4f52985b9747269e47b754e2 >> >> commit 4efeffc1d583597e4f52985b9747269e47b754e2 >> A

struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t (was: GNU C Library master sources branch, master, updated. glibc-2.15-229-g4efeffc)

2012-03-15 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 26 Feb 2012 18:17:52 -, drep...@sourceware.org wrote: > http://sources.redhat.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=4efeffc1d583597e4f52985b9747269e47b754e2 > > commit 4efeffc1d583597e4f52985b9747269e47b754e2 > Author: Ulrich Drepper > Date: Sun Feb 26 13:17:27 2012 -0500 >