On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
That's only 5 more memory operations. If I tweak vector swapping to avoid
calling swap on each member (which drops type-based aliasing information,
that was the topic of PR64601)
I didn't really understand the discussion in the PR. I find that's
tru
On 25/04/17 18:12 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25/04/17 17:23 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/04/17 22:10 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
It seems that this patch had 2 consequences that may or may
not have be
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25/04/17 17:23 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/04/17 22:10 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
It seems that this patch had 2 consequences that may or may not have been
planned. Consider this example (from PR646
On 25/04/17 17:23 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/04/17 22:10 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
It seems that this patch had 2 consequences that may or may not
have been planned. Consider this example (from PR64601)
#include
typedef std::vector V;
void f(
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/04/17 22:10 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
It seems that this patch had 2 consequences that may or may not have been
planned. Consider this example (from PR64601)
#include
typedef std::vector V;
void f(V&v,V&w){ V(std::move(w)).swap(v); }
void g(V
On 25/04/17 13:52 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/04/17 22:10 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
It seems that this patch had 2 consequences that may or may not have
been planned. Consider this example (from PR64601)
#include
typedef std::vector V;
void f(V&v,V&w){ V(std::move(w)).swap(v); }
void
On 24/04/17 22:10 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
It seems that this patch had 2 consequences that may or may not have
been planned. Consider this example (from PR64601)
#include
typedef std::vector V;
void f(V&v,V&w){ V(std::move(w)).swap(v); }
void g(V&v,V&w){ v=std::move(w); }
1) We generate sho
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 9 January 2014 12:22, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:27 AM, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is a patch to fix an issue in normal mode during the move
assignment. The destination vector allocator instance is moved too during
the assi
On 9 January 2014 12:22, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:27 AM, François Dumont
> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Here is a patch to fix an issue in normal mode during the move
>> assignment. The destination vector allocator instance is moved too during
>> the assignment which is wrong.
>>
>>
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:27 AM, François Dumont wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here is a patch to fix an issue in normal mode during the move
> assignment. The destination vector allocator instance is moved too during
> the assignment which is wrong.
>
> As I discover this problem while working on issu
On 27 December 2013 18:27, François Dumont wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here is a patch to fix an issue in normal mode during the move
> assignment. The destination vector allocator instance is moved too during
> the assignment which is wrong.
Thanks for your patience, the normal-mode fix is definitely cor
On 7 January 2014 21:12, François Dumont wrote:
> I saw on another thread that 4.9 release was getting closer. Applying this
> patch sounds like a good idear for this release.
>
> Any feedback ?
Yes, it's coming :-)
I imagine most of us have been on holiday and are just getting back to
speed, and
I saw on another thread that 4.9 release was getting closer. Applying
this patch sounds like a good idear for this release.
Any feedback ?
On 12/27/2013 07:27 PM, François Dumont wrote:
Hi
Here is a patch to fix an issue in normal mode during the move
assignment. The destination vector
Hi
Here is a patch to fix an issue in normal mode during the move
assignment. The destination vector allocator instance is moved too
during the assignment which is wrong.
As I discover this problem while working on issues with management
of safe iterators during move operations this
14 matches
Mail list logo
