Re: std::list optimizations

2017-08-22 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 21/08/17 21:14 +0200, François Dumont wrote: On 18/08/2017 22:04, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 28/07/17 18:42 +0200, François Dumont wrote: Hi Completing execution of the testsuite revealed a bug. So here is the correct version of this patch. François On 21/07/2017 19:14, François Dumont

Re: std::list optimizations

2017-08-21 Thread François Dumont
On 18/08/2017 22:04, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 28/07/17 18:42 +0200, François Dumont wrote: Hi Completing execution of the testsuite revealed a bug. So here is the correct version of this patch. François On 21/07/2017 19:14, François Dumont wrote: Hi Here is a proposal for 2 optimiz

Re: std::list optimizations

2017-08-18 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 28/07/17 18:42 +0200, François Dumont wrote: Hi Completing execution of the testsuite revealed a bug. So here is the correct version of this patch. François On 21/07/2017 19:14, François Dumont wrote: Hi Here is a proposal for 2 optimizations in the std::list implementation.

Re: std::list optimizations

2017-07-28 Thread François Dumont
Hi Completing execution of the testsuite revealed a bug. So here is the correct version of this patch. François On 21/07/2017 19:14, François Dumont wrote: Hi Here is a proposal for 2 optimizations in the std::list implementation. Optimization on the move constructor taking a

std::list optimizations

2017-07-21 Thread François Dumont
Hi Here is a proposal for 2 optimizations in the std::list implementation. Optimization on the move constructor taking an allocator for always equal allocators. Compare to the version in my previous std::list patch I am now doing it at std::list level rather than at _List_base level.