Re: rfa: shrink rtl_bb_info

2012-05-08 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Fri, 4 May 2012, Richard Guenther wrote: > Well, as you touch all places that refer to header/footer why not > introduce macros to access them ... > > > Currently regstrapping on x86_64-linux, okay if that passes? > > Ok with the above change. For completeness, this is what I checked in

Re: rfa: shrink rtl_bb_info

2012-05-04 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > Richi made some good points about my last patch, related to struct > rtl_bb_info.  Even though it's not that important to shrink it (only few > BBs are in RTL mode) there's no need to waste space.  My last patch > created an unused poin

rfa: shrink rtl_bb_info

2012-05-03 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, Richi made some good points about my last patch, related to struct rtl_bb_info. Even though it's not that important to shrink it (only few BBs are in RTL mode) there's no need to waste space. My last patch created an unused pointer-sized hole in RTL mode, which we can just as well use fo