On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> Concerning:
>
> 2008-11-20 Richard Guenther
>
> PR tree-optimization/37868
> * gcc.dg/torture/pr37868.c: New testcase.
> * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr38048-1.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.c-tor
Concerning:
2008-11-20 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/37868
* gcc.dg/torture/pr37868.c: New testcase.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr38048-1.c: Likewise.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr38048-2.c: Likewise.
So, is there any reason why we can't make the test
2013-07-26 Joern Rennecke
* gcc.dg/torture/pr37868.c: Disable for epiphany.
* gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c: Enable for epiphany.
Index: gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c
===
--- gcc.dg/sibcall-6.c (revision 201267)
+++ gcc.dg/sibcall-6
On Apr 20, 2011, at 5:22 AM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Mike Stump wrote:
>> I'd pre-approve hoisting these up into the lib/.exp files and checking a
>> generic target requirement... :-)
>>
>>> -/* { dg-skip-if "unaligned access" { sparc*-*-* } "*" "" } */
>>> +/* { dg-skip-if "unaligned access" { spa
Mike Stump wrote:
> I'd pre-approve hoisting these up into the lib/.exp files and checking a
> generic target requirement... :-)
>
>> -/* { dg-skip-if "unaligned access" { sparc*-*-* } "*" "" } */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "unaligned access" { sparc*-*-* sh*-*-* } "*" "" } */
I've thought the same t
On Apr 19, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> gcc.dg/torture/pr37868.c fails on SH because of unaligned accesses.
> The patch below skips the test as is done for sparc targets.
I'd pre-approve hoisting these up into the lib/.exp files and checking a
generic target
Hi,
gcc.dg/torture/pr37868.c fails on SH because of unaligned accesses.
The patch below skips the test as is done for sparc targets.
It's tested with bootstrap and regtest on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
Applied on trunk.
Regards,
kaz
--
2011-04-19 Kaz Kojima
PR testsuite/
