On 02/20/2018 10:35 AM, Sriraman Tallam via binutils wrote:
> Ping. Is this alright to apply now or should I wait for Stage 1?
>
> * plugin-api.h (ld_plugin_get_wrap_symbols): New
> plugin interface.
>
> Thanks
> Sri
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
>> Ping, this
Hi Cary, Hi Sriraman,
>> Ping. Is this alright to apply now or should I wait for Stage 1?
>>
>> * plugin-api.h (ld_plugin_get_wrap_symbols): New
>> plugin interface.
>
> I'd say go ahead and apply the patch in binutils, and wait for Stage 1
> to sync back to GCC, unless someone there OKs it so
> Ping. Is this alright to apply now or should I wait for Stage 1?
>
> * plugin-api.h (ld_plugin_get_wrap_symbols): New
> plugin interface.
I'd say go ahead and apply the patch in binutils, and wait for Stage 1
to sync back to GCC, unless someone there OKs it sooner.
Nick, is that OK?
-cary
Ping. Is this alright to apply now or should I wait for Stage 1?
* plugin-api.h (ld_plugin_get_wrap_symbols): New
plugin interface.
Thanks
Sri
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> Ping, this patch was approved for binutils by Cary:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2
Ping, this patch was approved for binutils by Cary:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-12/msg00023.html
Is it ok to apply this to GCC include/plugin-api.h now? It is a
pretty small change. Patch attached.
* plugin-api.h (ld_plugin_get_wrap_symbols): New
plugin interface.
Thanks
Sri
On
Patch attached.
* plugin-api.h (ld_plugin_get_wrap_symbols): New
plugin interface.
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> Hi,
>
>This patch was approved for binutils by Cary:
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-12/msg00023.html
>
>Is it ok to apply this to GCC
Hi,
This patch was approved for binutils by Cary:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-12/msg00023.html
Is it ok to apply this to GCC include/plugin-api.h ?
Thanks
Sri
