On 12/01/2012 04:28 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Kenneth Zadeck writes:
2) The patch does not work for rtxes at all. Rtxes have to copied.
Trees could be pointer copied.
The problem is that CONST_INTs are not canonized in a way that wide-ints
are or that trees could be.
This comes from the u
Kenneth Zadeck writes:
> 2) The patch does not work for rtxes at all. Rtxes have to copied.
> Trees could be pointer copied.
> The problem is that CONST_INTs are not canonized in a way that wide-ints
> are or that trees could be.
> This comes from the use of the GEN_INT macro that does not t
forgot the patch
On 11/30/2012 01:03 PM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
Richi
this patch is our attempt to implement the storage classes for wide
int as you suggested. The patch currently does not work for reasons
that will be mentioned below, but we stopped work on it because it is
clear that this
Richi
this patch is our attempt to implement the storage classes for wide int
as you suggested. The patch currently does not work for reasons that
will be mentioned below, but we stopped work on it because it is clear
that this is a terrible idea.
1) Having more than one storage class is l
