[arm-embedded][committed] patch for PR61578

2016-06-13 Thread Andre Vieira (lists)
Hi Backported the following two patches to embedded-5-branch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg00096.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg02028.html Committed as revisions r237369 and r237371. gcc/ChangeLog.arm: 2016-06-13 Andre Vieira Backport from Mainline

a patch for PR61578

2015-09-25 Thread Vladimir Makarov
The following patch is for s390 regression introduced by the first patch for PR61578: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86-64. Committed as rev. 228154. 2015-09-25 Vladimir Makarov PR target/61578 * lra

Re: patch for PR61578

2015-09-25 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 09/25/2015 12:57 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 09/24/2015 02:41 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: The following patch solves the 2nd case of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 I did a lot of benchmarking of different heuristics in hard reg cost propagation in IRA. This is the best

Re: patch for PR61578

2015-09-25 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/24/2015 02:41 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: The following patch solves the 2nd case of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 I did a lot of benchmarking of different heuristics in hard reg cost propagation in IRA. This is the best what I found. The patch improves stably

Re: patch for PR61578

2015-09-24 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/24/2015 02:41 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: The following patch solves the 2nd case of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 I did a lot of benchmarking of different heuristics in hard reg cost propagation in IRA. This is the best what I found. The patch improves stably

patch for PR61578

2015-09-24 Thread Vladimir Makarov
The following patch solves the 2nd case of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 I did a lot of benchmarking of different heuristics in hard reg cost propagation in IRA. This is the best what I found. The patch improves stably code size of SPEC2000 and its score although it

Re: patch for PR61578

2015-09-23 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 03:39:19PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > The following patch is for > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 > > The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86 and x86-64. > > Committed as rev. 227382. > > 2015-09-01 Vladimir Makarov > >

Re: patch for PR61578

2015-09-04 Thread Christophe Lyon
On 3 September 2015 at 20:28, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > On 09/03/2015 11:00 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: >> >> On 09/02/2015 11:32 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: >>> >>> Hi Vladimir, >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1 September 2015 at 21:39, Vladimir Makarov >>> wrote: The following patch is for

Re: patch for PR61578

2015-09-03 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 09/03/2015 11:00 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: On 09/02/2015 11:32 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: Hi Vladimir, On 1 September 2015 at 21:39, Vladimir Makarov wrote: The following patch is for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x

Re: patch for PR61578

2015-09-03 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 09/02/2015 11:32 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: Hi Vladimir, On 1 September 2015 at 21:39, Vladimir Makarov wrote: The following patch is for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86 and x86-64. Committed as rev. 227382. Sin

Re: patch for PR61578

2015-09-02 Thread Christophe Lyon
Hi Vladimir, On 1 September 2015 at 21:39, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > The following patch is for > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 > > The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86 and x86-64. > > Committed as rev. 227382. > Since this patch, I can see: gcc.dg/vect/s

patch for PR61578

2015-09-01 Thread Vladimir Makarov
The following patch is for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578 The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86 and x86-64. Committed as rev. 227382. 2015-09-01 Vladimir Makarov PR target/61578 * lra-lives.c (process_bb_lives): Process move pseudos with the