Re: libstdc++ PATCH to harmonize noexcept

2017-12-05 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 01/12/17 15:32 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 14/11/17 13:56 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote: While working on an unrelated issue I noticed that the compiler didn't like some of these declarations after preprocessing, when they aren't protected by system-header permissiveness. I thought about l

Re: libstdc++ PATCH to harmonize noexcept

2017-12-01 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 14/11/17 13:56 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote: While working on an unrelated issue I noticed that the compiler didn't like some of these declarations after preprocessing, when they aren't protected by system-header permissiveness. I thought about limiting the permissiveness to only extern "C" fun

Re: libstdc++ PATCH to harmonize noexcept

2017-11-14 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 14/11/17 13:56 -0500, Jason Merrill wrote: While working on an unrelated issue I noticed that the compiler didn't like some of these declarations after preprocessing, when they aren't protected by system-header permissiveness. I thought about limiting the permissiveness to only extern "C" fun

libstdc++ PATCH to harmonize noexcept

2017-11-14 Thread Jason Merrill
While working on an unrelated issue I noticed that the compiler didn't like some of these declarations after preprocessing, when they aren't protected by system-header permissiveness. I thought about limiting the permissiveness to only extern "C" functions, but I believe that system headers are ad