Re: libsanitizer merge from upstream r196489

2013-12-05 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:54:23AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: >> I am testing this for the libm issue. > > Preapproved with proper ChangeLog entry if it works. > >> --- a/libsanitizer/configure.ac >> +++ b/libsanitizer/configure.ac >> @@ -87,7 +87,

Re: libsanitizer merge from upstream r196489

2013-12-05 Thread H.J. Lu
#x27; build is broken for me the same way >>> >>> Should be fixed now (only configure/make build was affected and I >>> tested the cmake build before committing) >>> >>>> >>>> Dmitry >>>> >>>> 2013/12/5 Tobias Burnus : >&g

Re: libsanitizer merge from upstream r196489

2013-12-05 Thread Konstantin Serebryany
onfigure/make build was affected and I >> tested the cmake build before committing) >> >>> >>> Dmitry >>> >>> 2013/12/5 Tobias Burnus : >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:06:52PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wro

Re: libsanitizer merge from upstream r196489

2013-12-05 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:54:23AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote: > I am testing this for the libm issue. Preapproved with proper ChangeLog entry if it works. > --- a/libsanitizer/configure.ac > +++ b/libsanitizer/configure.ac > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ AM_CONDITIONAL(LSAN_SUPPORTED, [test > "x$LSAN_SUPPORTED" =

Re: libsanitizer merge from upstream r196489

2013-12-05 Thread H.J. Lu
onfigure/make build was affected and I >> tested the cmake build before committing) >> >>> >>> Dmitry >>> >>> 2013/12/5 Tobias Burnus : >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:06:52PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wro

Re: libsanitizer merge from upstream r196489

2013-12-05 Thread H.J. Lu
mitting) > >> >> Dmitry >> >> 2013/12/5 Tobias Burnus : >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:06:52PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote: >>>> Another libsanitizer merge from upstream, r196489 >>>> (Quick follow

Re: libsanitizer merge from upstream r196489

2013-12-05 Thread Konstantin Serebryany
>> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:06:52PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote: >>> Another libsanitizer merge from upstream, r196489 >>> (Quick follow up after the r196090 merge) >> >> That commit breaks the build with: >> >> In file included from ../../.

Re: libsanitizer merge from upstream r196489

2013-12-05 Thread Дмитрий Дьяченко
clang' build is broken for me the same way Dmitry 2013/12/5 Tobias Burnus : > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:06:52PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote: >> Another libsanitizer merge from upstream, r196489 >> (Quick follow up after the r196090 merge) > > T

Re: libsanitizer merge from upstream r196489

2013-12-05 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi, On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:06:52PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote: > Another libsanitizer merge from upstream, r196489 > (Quick follow up after the r196090 merge) That commit breaks the build with: In file included from ../../../../libsanitizer/tsan/tsan_rtl_report.c

Re: libsanitizer merge from upstream r196489

2013-12-05 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 02:06:52PM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote: > Another libsanitizer merge from upstream, r196489 > (Quick follow up after the r196090 merge) > > Fixes (hopefully) .cfi and ppc32 support. > > Tested on x86_64 Linux Ubuntu 12.04 box: > make -j

libsanitizer merge from upstream r196489

2013-12-05 Thread Konstantin Serebryany
Another libsanitizer merge from upstream, r196489 (Quick follow up after the r196090 merge) Fixes (hopefully) .cfi and ppc32 support. Tested on x86_64 Linux Ubuntu 12.04 box: make -j 40 -C gcc check-g{cc,++} RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\} asan.exp' The ubsan testing