On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:50:21AM +, Jay Foad wrote:
> I see now that it's already reported as PR c/68473.
Ooops, sorry, I knew about that one, but thought that's a different problem.
Marek
On 24 November 2015 at 11:34, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:24:38AM +, Jay Foad wrote:
>> r230331 also seems to be causing this on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu:
>>
>> $ cat x.c
>> #define P(b) b&&4
>> int a[]=0;
>> int f() { X||P(d); }
>> $ ~/gcc/build/gcc/cc1 -quiet -Wall x.c
>> [.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:24:38AM +, Jay Foad wrote:
> r230331 also seems to be causing this on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu:
>
> $ cat x.c
> #define P(b) b&&4
> int a[]=0;
> int f() { X||P(d); }
> $ ~/gcc/build/gcc/cc1 -quiet -Wall x.c
> [...]
> x.c:3:1: internal compiler error: in contains_point, at
(Resending as plain text. Sorry for the HTML!)
On 14 November 2015 at 14:50, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> This patch causes numerous new testsuite failure on AIX caused by the
> compiler crashing during compilation, e.g.
r230331 also seems to be causing this on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu:
$ cat x.c
#defi
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:00 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 13:54 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:12 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 16:24 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> >> On 11/17/2015 04:13 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>> >> > On Mon,
On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 13:54 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:12 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 16:24 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >> On 11/17/2015 04:13 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 22:34 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >> >>
> >>
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:12 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 16:24 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> On 11/17/2015 04:13 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 22:34 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Should c_expr perhaps acquire a constructor so that this problem
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 16:24 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/17/2015 04:13 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 22:34 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >>
> >> Should c_expr perhaps acquire a constructor so that this problem is
> >> avoided in the future? The whole thing seems somewhat
On 11/17/2015 04:13 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 22:34 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Should c_expr perhaps acquire a constructor so that this problem is
avoided in the future? The whole thing seems somewhat error-prone.
I agree that it's error prone, and the ctor approach is w
On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 22:34 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/16/2015 09:50 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > The root cause is uninitialized data. Specifically, the C parser's
> > struct c_expr gained a "src_range" field, and it turns out there are a
> > few places where I wasn't initializing this w
On 11/16/2015 09:50 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
The root cause is uninitialized data. Specifically, the C parser's
struct c_expr gained a "src_range" field, and it turns out there are a
few places where I wasn't initializing this when returning c_expr
instances on the stack, and in some cases the v
On Sat, 2015-11-14 at 23:32 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-11-14 at 09:50 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > This patch causes numerous new testsuite failure on AIX caused by the
> > compiler crashing during compilation, e.g.
> >
> > gcc.c-torture/execute/20020206-1.c
> >
> > in GCC lib
On Sat, 2015-11-14 at 09:50 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> This patch causes numerous new testsuite failure on AIX caused by the
> compiler crashing during compilation, e.g.
>
> gcc.c-torture/execute/20020206-1.c
>
> in GCC libcpp
>
> 991 linemap_assert (line >= LINEMAPS_MACRO_LOWEST_LOCAT
This patch causes numerous new testsuite failure on AIX caused by the
compiler crashing during compilation, e.g.
gcc.c-torture/execute/20020206-1.c
in GCC libcpp
991 linemap_assert (line >= LINEMAPS_MACRO_LOWEST_LOCATION (set));
(gdb) where
#0 _Z11fancy_abortPKciS0_ (
file=0x11296dc0
On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 14:14 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 00:15 -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 10/23/2015 02:41 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > As in the previous version of this patch
> > > "Implement tree expression tracking in C FE (v2)"
> > > the patch now captures ranges
15 matches
Mail list logo
