On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 06:08:33PM +, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > Hi Honza,
> >
> > This is more a note for other interested AArch64 testers, but this patch
> > breaks some tests on aarch64-none-elf. Looking at the test output, this
> > is a problem with the tests than with your patch. We now
On 3 March 2015 at 21:01, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I built with r221117. I see errors while building following targets:
>> > aarch64_be-none-linux-gnu, aarch64_be-none-linux-gnu,
>> > arm-none-linux-gnueabihf, arm-none-linux-gnueabi.
>>
>> Indeed, it's broken again since r221099.
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I built with r221117. I see errors while building following targets:
> > aarch64_be-none-linux-gnu, aarch64_be-none-linux-gnu,
> > arm-none-linux-gnueabihf, arm-none-linux-gnueabi.
>
> Indeed, it's broken again since r221099.
Accidentally I reverted the var->alias check (probably
On 3 March 2015 at 13:44, Alex Velenko wrote:
> On 02/03/15 22:04, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> On 2 March 2015 at 21:21, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On 01/03/15 16:47, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> On 27 February 2015 at 21:49, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> ../sysde
On 02/03/15 22:04, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 2 March 2015 at 21:21, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On 01/03/15 16:47, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 27 February 2015 at 21:49, Jan Hubicka wrote:
../sysdeps/gnu/siglist.c:72:1: internal compiler error: in address_matters_p,
at symtab.c:1908
versioned_sym
On 2 March 2015 at 21:21, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/03/15 16:47, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> >On 27 February 2015 at 21:49, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>../sysdeps/gnu/siglist.c:72:1: internal compiler error: in
>> >>>address_matters_p, at symtab.c:1908
>> >>> versioned_symbol (libc, _
>
>
> On 01/03/15 16:47, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >On 27 February 2015 at 21:49, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >>>
> >>>../sysdeps/gnu/siglist.c:72:1: internal compiler error: in
> >>>address_matters_p, at symtab.c:1908
> >>> versioned_symbol (libc, __new_sys_sigabbrev, sys_sigabbrev, GLIBC_2_3_3);
> >
On 01/03/15 16:47, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 27 February 2015 at 21:49, Jan Hubicka wrote:
../sysdeps/gnu/siglist.c:72:1: internal compiler error: in address_matters_p,
at symtab.c:1908
versioned_symbol (libc, __new_sys_sigabbrev, sys_sigabbrev, GLIBC_2_3_3);
^
0x66a080 symtab_node::add
On 27 February 2015 at 21:49, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
>> ../sysdeps/gnu/siglist.c:72:1: internal compiler error: in
>> address_matters_p, at symtab.c:1908
>> versioned_symbol (libc, __new_sys_sigabbrev, sys_sigabbrev, GLIBC_2_3_3);
>> ^
>> 0x66a080 symtab_node::address_matters_p()
>> /scr
>
> Hi Honza,
>
> This is more a note for other interested AArch64 testers, but this patch
> breaks some tests on aarch64-none-elf. Looking at the test output, this
> is a problem with the tests than with your patch. We now eliminate some
> function bodies which are identical across test function
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 02:10:47AM +, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> * ipa-icf.c (symbol_compare_collection::symbol_compare_colleciton):
> Use address_matters_p.
> (redirect_all_callers, set_addressable): New functions.
> (sem_function::merge): Reorganize and fix merging i
>
> ../sysdeps/gnu/siglist.c:72:1: internal compiler error: in address_matters_p,
> at symtab.c:1908
> versioned_symbol (libc, __new_sys_sigabbrev, sys_sigabbrev, GLIBC_2_3_3);
> ^
> 0x66a080 symtab_node::address_matters_p()
> /scratch/sellcey/repos/bootstrap/src/gcc/gcc/symtab.c:1908
>
On 02/27/2015 07:04 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> Following up to my own email. I can reproduce this with the following
> cut down test case if I compile with '-O2 -fmerge-all-constants' on
> MIPS.
>
> extern const char *const _sys_siglist[128];
> const char *const __new_sys_siglist[128] = { };
> ext
On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 09:33 -0800, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 03:10 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, comitted.
> >
> > Honza
> > * ipa-icf.c (symbol_compare_collection::symbol_compare_colleciton):
> > Use address_matters_p.
>
> I think
On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 03:10 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, comitted.
>
> Honza
> * ipa-icf.c (symbol_compare_collection::symbol_compare_colleciton):
> Use address_matters_p.
I think this patch is causing an ICE while building glibc on MIPS. I am
bui
>
> This caused:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65237
Hi,
this is patch I commited. gcc.dg/attr-noinline.c has template that counts
number of calls
in optimized assembler. Those do not match if one function is turned into
another's wrapper.
gcc.dg/noreturn-7.c misses one wa
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> this is the final version of patch I comitted. It has new fix to
> make_decl_local
> to set TREE_ADDRESSABLE becuase we leave the flag undefined for non-local
> decls.
> I also dropped Optimization from fmerge-all-constants, fmerge-con
Hi,
this is the final version of patch I comitted. It has new fix to
make_decl_local
to set TREE_ADDRESSABLE becuase we leave the flag undefined for non-local decls.
I also dropped Optimization from fmerge-all-constants, fmerge-constants
those can not be done in function speicfic way, I made
ipa
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> I plan to commit after some further testing tomorrow and having chance
> Martin to look across the changes and discuss 5).
>
> Honza
>
Is this still going in today or is there a newer patch to test?
Jack
On 2015.02.25 at 19:32 +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 02/25/2015 06:15 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> On 2015.02.25 at 09:38 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >>> this patch reorganize sem_function::merge and sem_variable::merge.
> >>> I read the code in detail and found several issues that are fixed in th
On 02/25/2015 06:15 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
On 2015.02.25 at 09:38 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
this patch reorganize sem_function::merge and sem_variable::merge.
I read the code in detail and found several issues that are fixed in the
following patch.
I gave your patch a quick spin. It breaks Chr
> On 2015.02.25 at 09:38 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > this patch reorganize sem_function::merge and sem_variable::merge.
> > I read the code in detail and found several issues that are fixed in the
> > following patch.
>
> I gave your patch a quick spin. It breaks Chromium. Its protocol buffer
>
On 2015.02.25 at 09:38 +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> this patch reorganize sem_function::merge and sem_variable::merge.
> I read the code in detail and found several issues that are fixed in the
> following patch.
I gave your patch a quick spin. It breaks Chromium. Its protocol buffer
compiler gets
Hi,
this patch reorganize sem_function::merge and sem_variable::merge.
I read the code in detail and found several issues that are fixed in the
following patch.
1) The logic whether address matters was wrong and ignored symbol aliases.
I separated it into symtab_node::address_matters predi
24 matches
Mail list logo
