On Apr 11, 2012, at 4:52 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2012, at 7:04 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> On 04/11/2012 04:02 PM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 11, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
I'm working on a target where intptr_t and pointers are larger than
size_t and
On Apr 11, 2012, at 6:55 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> I'm working on a target where intptr_t and pointers are larger than
> size_t and ptrdiff_t.
Hum, we question your sanity :-)
> Ok?
Ok. I hope you tested it on your target too!
On Apr 11, 2012, at 7:04 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 04:02 PM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>> I'm working on a target where intptr_t and pointers are larger than
>>> size_t and ptrdiff_t. The testsuite has problems in this area, sinc
On 04/11/2012 04:02 PM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
>> I'm working on a target where intptr_t and pointers are larger than
>> size_t and ptrdiff_t. The testsuite has problems in this area, since we
>> often use the latter two types for casting fr
On Apr 11, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> I'm working on a target where intptr_t and pointers are larger than
> size_t and ptrdiff_t. The testsuite has problems in this area, since we
> often use the latter two types for casting from/to pointers, leading to
> unwanted warnings. In some
I'm working on a target where intptr_t and pointers are larger than
size_t and ptrdiff_t. The testsuite has problems in this area, since we
often use the latter two types for casting from/to pointers, leading to
unwanted warnings. In some cases I've checked the corresponding PRs and
found that the
