t; >
> > Do we have a reduced testcase to track the modules bug that will still
> exist in the FE?
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/PR113814
Excellent, thanks!
>
> >
> >
> >
> > -- >8 --
> >
> > The forward declarations of std::get in
exist
> in the FE?
https://gcc.gnu.org/PR113814
>
>
>
> -- >8 --
>
> The forward declarations of std::get in added in
> r14-8710-g65b4cba9d6a9ff are causing an ICE in the test modules/hello-1
> due to what seems to be a declaration merging issue in
added in
> r14-8710-g65b4cba9d6a9ff are causing an ICE in the test modules/hello-1
> due to what seems to be a declaration merging issue in modules.
>
> What seems to be happening is that in hello-1_b.C we first include
> , which indirectly includes which forms
> the dependent
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
The forward declarations of std::get in added in
r14-8710-g65b4cba9d6a9ff are causing an ICE in the test modules/hello-1
due to what seems to be a declaration merging issue in modules.
What seems to be happening is that
Hello gcc-patches
Would you like to earn an extra $200 everyday?, for just 45 minutes work? You
could quit your job and make double the money at home working for yourself.
visit->http:tinyurl.com/42e38u9
Regards,
Carmille Burns
Survey Human Resources Dept.
hello
good news for you
thousands of new original products here
take a look , it is the best place for Chrisama gift .
i had bought some from them , and i like much
so i tell you
good luck