> Am 29.11.2024 um 23:45 schrieb Joseph Myers :
>
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> I think we're trying to handle errorneous cases by setting TREE_VALUE
>> to error_mark_node
>> before this, so how about the following instead?
>
> Yes, that works, and also fixes the test in
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024, Richard Biener wrote:
> I think we're trying to handle errorneous cases by setting TREE_VALUE
> to error_mark_node
> before this, so how about the following instead?
Yes, that works, and also fixes the test in bug 100792 unlike my previous
patch. Here's a full, tested patch
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 3:04 AM Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> As reported in bug 100501 (plus duplicates), the gimplifier ICEs for C
> tests involving a statement expression not returning a value as an asm
> input.
>
> The expected diagnostic for this case (as seen for C++ input) is one
> coming from th
As reported in bug 100501 (plus duplicates), the gimplifier ICEs for C
tests involving a statement expression not returning a value as an asm
input.
The expected diagnostic for this case (as seen for C++ input) is one
coming from the gimplifier and so it seems reasonable to fix the
gimplifier to h
